Coming from traditional SEO, I’m struggling to understand how AI engines actually find and use content. It seems fundamentally different from Google’s crawl-index-rank model.
My confusion:
Practical questions:
Would love to hear from anyone who’s dug into the technical side of this.
Great questions. Let me break down the fundamental differences:
Traditional Search (Google) vs AI Engines:
| Aspect | Traditional Search | AI Engines |
|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Build searchable index | Train models OR retrieve real-time |
| Content storage | Stores in database | Uses for training, not traditional indexing |
| Ranking method | Keywords, backlinks, authority | Semantic meaning, quality, relevance |
| User interaction | Keyword queries | Conversational questions |
| Output | List of links | Synthesized answers with citations |
Two types of AI content usage:
Training data - Content crawled months/years ago that’s baked into the model’s weights. You can’t easily update this.
Real-time retrieval (RAG) - Content fetched at query time. This is where platforms like Perplexity and ChatGPT’s web browsing mode get current information.
Key insight: Most AI visibility opportunities are in real-time retrieval, not training data. That’s the battleground for content optimization.
I’ve been analyzing AI crawler behavior in our server logs for 6 months. Here’s what I’ve observed:
Major AI crawlers and their behavior:
| Crawler | Pattern | Robots.txt Respect | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | Sustained bursts | Yes | OpenAI’s main crawler |
| ClaudeBot | Moderate, consistent | Yes | Anthropic’s crawler |
| PerplexityBot | More continuous | Yes | Real-time retrieval focused |
| ChatGPT-User | Query-triggered | Yes | Fetches during conversations |
Crawl patterns differ from Googlebot:
Practical findings:
Technical recommendation: Ensure server-side rendering for important content. AI crawlers often can’t execute JavaScript effectively.
On the structured data question - this is HUGE for AI indexing.
Schema markup that matters for AI:
Why schema helps AI:
Real data: Sites with comprehensive schema markup see ~40% higher citation rates in our testing. AI systems prefer content they can understand quickly and accurately.
Implementation tip: Don’t just add schema - make sure it accurately reflects your content. Misleading schema can hurt you when AI systems cross-reference.
This is clearing things up. So the key difference is that AI systems use content differently - either baked into training (hard to influence) or real-time retrieval (optimizable).
Follow-up: How do we know if our content is being used in real-time retrieval? Is there any way to see when AI systems cite us?
There’s no perfect equivalent to Google Search Console for AI, but there are ways to track this:
Monitoring approaches:
Manual testing - Query AI systems with questions your content should answer. See if you’re cited.
Log analysis - Track AI crawler visits and correlate with citation appearances.
Dedicated tools - Am I Cited and similar platforms track your brand/URL mentions across AI systems.
Referral traffic - Monitor referrals from AI platforms (though attribution is tricky).
What Am I Cited shows us:
Key insight: Unlike traditional SEO where you optimize and check rankings, AI visibility requires active monitoring because there’s no “SERP position” equivalent. Your content might be cited for some queries and not others, and this changes based on user phrasing.
From a content perspective, here’s what matters for AI indexing:
Content characteristics AI systems prioritize:
Content that struggles:
The paradigm shift: Traditional SEO: “How do I rank for this keyword?” AI optimization: “How do I become the authoritative source AI trusts for this topic?”
It’s less about gaming algorithms and more about genuinely being the best resource.
On robots.txt and AI crawlers:
Current best practices:
# Allow beneficial AI crawlers
User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /
User-agent: PerplexityBot
Allow: /
# Block if needed
User-agent: SomeOtherBot
Disallow: /
Important considerations:
My recommendation: For most sites, allow AI crawlers. The visibility benefits outweigh concerns about content being used for training. If you block, you’re invisible to AI search.
Exception: If you have paid content or want licensing revenue from AI companies, blocking makes sense. But for most content sites, visibility is the goal.
The JavaScript point keeps coming up. We have a React-based site with heavy JS rendering.
Quick question: Is server-side rendering (SSR) essential for AI crawlers? Or will pre-rendering work?
Based on our testing:
JS handling by AI crawlers:
Solutions in order of effectiveness:
Server-Side Rendering (SSR) - Best option. Content is HTML before reaching the browser.
Static Site Generation (SSG) - Also excellent. Pre-built HTML pages.
Pre-rendering - Can work, but needs proper implementation. Serve pre-rendered HTML to bot user-agents.
Hybrid rendering - Critical content SSR, non-essential content client-side.
Testing tip: View your pages with JavaScript disabled. If the important content disappears, AI crawlers probably can’t see it either.
Our results: After implementing SSR for our JS-heavy product pages, AI citations increased 4x within 3 months.
Practical checklist I use for AI indexing optimization:
Technical requirements:
Content requirements:
Monitoring:
This framework has helped us systematically improve our AI visibility.
Incredible thread everyone. Here’s my summary of key takeaways:
The fundamental shift: AI indexing is about real-time retrieval and semantic understanding, not traditional crawl-index-rank.
Technical priorities:
Content priorities:
Monitoring: Use tools like Am I Cited to track citations since there’s no SERP equivalent for AI visibility.
This gives me a clear roadmap. Thanks everyone!
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor which AI bots are crawling your content and how your pages appear in AI-generated answers.
Community discussion on how AI search engines index and discover content. Technical experts explain the differences between traditional search indexing and AI c...
Community discussion on how AI search engines work. Real experiences from marketers understanding LLMs, RAG, and semantic search compared to traditional search.
Community discussion on submitting content to AI engines. Exploring what you can actually control about AI content discovery versus what you have to wait for.