Discussion Content Gaps Content Strategy

How do you find content gaps specifically for AI search? Traditional keyword tools miss so much

CO
ContentGaps_Anna · Content Strategy Manager
· · 76 upvotes · 9 comments
CA
ContentGaps_Anna
Content Strategy Manager · December 30, 2025

Traditional content gap analysis: Look at keywords competitors rank for that you don’t.

But for AI search, this doesn’t capture the full picture. AI doesn’t just “rank” content - it cites sources for specific information. The gaps are different.

What I’m finding:

  • Some topics we rank #1 for, but AI cites competitors instead
  • Some niche topics have no good source - AI synthesizes poorly
  • Questions people ask AI don’t match traditional keyword data

What I need:

  • A methodology for finding AI-specific content gaps
  • How to identify topics where we could be THE cited source
  • How to prioritize gaps based on AI citation opportunity

Has anyone developed a systematic approach to AI content gap analysis?

9 comments

9 Comments

AE
AIGapAnalysis_Expert Expert AI Content Strategist · December 30, 2025

I developed a methodology for this. AI gap analysis is fundamentally different from keyword gaps.

The AI Gap Analysis Framework:

Step 1: Build Your Question Map

Start with your topic/category. List every question someone might ask AI:

  • “What is [topic]?”
  • “How does [topic] work?”
  • “Best [category] for [use case]?”
  • “How do I [action related to topic]?”
  • “[Topic A] vs [Topic B]?”

Aim for 50-100 questions covering your space.

Step 2: Test Each Question

For each question, query ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Record:

  • Who gets cited? (competitor A, competitor B, other source)
  • Are YOU cited? If not, why not?
  • What format is the cited content? (FAQ, table, how-to)
  • What specific info does AI extract?

Step 3: Categorize Your Gaps

Gap Type 1: Competitor Cited, You’re Not They have content, you don’t. Or their content is better structured.

Gap Type 2: No Good Source (AI Synthesizes Poorly) AI pieces together answer from multiple sources. Opportunity to be THE source.

Gap Type 3: You’re Cited, But Not First You appear, but others appear more prominently.

Step 4: Prioritize by Opportunity

  • Gap Type 2 = Highest opportunity (greenfield)
  • Gap Type 1 = Medium opportunity (compete)
  • Gap Type 3 = Lower priority (optimize existing)
CA
ContentGaps_Anna OP · December 30, 2025
Replying to AIGapAnalysis_Expert
The “no good source” gap type is interesting. How do you identify these systematically?
AE
AIGapAnalysis_Expert Expert · December 30, 2025
Replying to ContentGaps_Anna

Identifying “No Good Source” Opportunities:

Signs that AI lacks a good source:

  1. AI gives vague answer Generic response without specific citations or details.

  2. Multiple sources cited When AI cites 4-5 different sources for one answer, none is authoritative.

  3. Hedging language “Some experts suggest…” “It depends…” without clear guidance.

  4. Outdated information AI cites sources from 2-3+ years ago because nothing current exists.

  5. Conflicting citations AI mentions different approaches from different sources without synthesizing.

How to find these systematically:

Query your topic space with increasingly specific questions. The more specific, the more likely you’ll hit “no good source” territory.

Example progression:

  • “What is email marketing?” (plenty of sources)
  • “Email marketing for healthcare companies” (fewer)
  • “Email marketing automation for HIPAA compliance” (possibly no definitive source)

Niche + specific = opportunity for authority.

When you find these, create THE definitive resource. No competition. Pure opportunity.

C
CompetitorGapHunter Competitive Intelligence · December 29, 2025

Competitor-focused gap analysis:

Step 1: Identify Top 3 Competitors Who appears most in AI responses for your category?

Step 2: Reverse Engineer Their Coverage What questions trigger their citations? What content formats get cited?

Step 3: Map Your Overlap

Create comparison matrix:

QuestionCompetitor ACompetitor BUs
“What is X?”CitedNot citedCited
“How to X?”CitedCitedNOT
“X vs Y?”NOTCitedNOT

Step 4: Prioritize Your Gaps

Focus on questions where:

  • Competitor A AND B are cited, but not you (proven demand)
  • You have domain expertise to create superior content
  • Question aligns with your business goals

The insight:

Competitors’ AI visibility reveals proven citation opportunities. They’ve done the demand validation for you. Now create better content.

QT
QuestionMining_Tom · December 29, 2025

Where to find questions people ask AI:

1. Your Own Support/Sales Teams What questions do customers ask that they might have asked AI first?

2. Reddit and Forums What questions are people asking in your space? Especially look for “I asked ChatGPT about X and…”

3. Answer the Public / AlsoAsked Traditional question tools still help identify question patterns.

4. ChatGPT Itself Ask: “What questions might someone ask about [your topic]?” AI generates its own question ideas.

5. Perplexity Related Questions After a query, Perplexity suggests related questions. Mine these.

6. Your Analytics What internal search queries do people run on your site? Often overlap with AI queries.

7. Competitor Content What questions do their FAQs answer? What do their H2s ask?

Build a master list. Test each in AI. Find your gaps.

D
DataDrivenGaps · December 29, 2025

Quantifying gap opportunity:

Not all gaps are equal. Prioritize by:

1. Citation Frequency How often does this question type get asked? More common question = bigger opportunity.

2. Commercial Value Does this question lead to buying decisions? “What is X” = informational “Best X for [use case]” = commercial “X vs Y pricing” = high commercial intent

3. Authority Achievability Can you realistically become THE source? Your core expertise = more achievable Tangential topics = harder

4. Content Investment What would it take to create definitive content? Quick win (restructure existing) vs. major project (new research)

Scoring matrix:

GapFrequencyCommercialAchievabilityInvestmentScore
Gap 1HighMediumHighLowPriority 1
Gap 2MediumHighHighMediumPriority 2
Gap 3HighLowMediumHighPriority 3

Prioritize: High frequency + High commercial + High achievability + Low investment

NS
NicheOpportunity_Sara · December 28, 2025

The biggest opportunities are often in niches:

Why niche gaps are valuable:

  1. Less competition Fewer players = easier to become THE source.

  2. Higher specificity = higher trust “Expert in [specific thing]” > “We cover everything.”

  3. Better match to queries Specific questions get specific answers. If you have the specific content, you get cited.

How to find niche gaps:

Take any broad topic. Add modifiers:

  • Industry: “[Topic] for healthcare”
  • Company size: “[Topic] for enterprises”
  • Use case: “[Topic] for customer retention”
  • Role: “[Topic] for marketing managers”
  • Challenge: “[Topic] when budget is limited”

Each modifier creates a niche question. Test which have gaps.

Example:

Broad: “Email marketing best practices” (Tons of competition, hard to stand out)

Niche: “Email marketing for B2B SaaS free trial conversion” (Specific, fewer sources, achievable authority)

Find your niches. Own them completely.

CA
ContentGaps_Anna OP Content Strategy Manager · December 27, 2025

This thread gave me a complete methodology. Here’s my plan:

Phase 1: Question Mapping (Week 1)

  • Build list of 100 questions for our space
  • Sources: support tickets, Reddit, competitor content, AI suggestions
  • Organize by topic cluster

Phase 2: Gap Testing (Week 2)

  • Test each question in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini
  • Document who’s cited for each
  • Categorize gaps: competitor-only, no good source, we’re secondary

Phase 3: Prioritization (Week 3)

  • Score each gap by: frequency, commercial value, achievability, investment
  • Identify top 10-15 opportunities
  • Focus on “no good source” opportunities first

Phase 4: Content Planning (Week 4)

  • Create content briefs for priority gaps
  • Specify format based on what gets cited
  • Plan for authority (comprehensive, well-structured, extractable)

Key insight:

AI gap analysis isn’t about keywords. It’s about citation opportunities. Find questions where you could be THE source, not just A source.

Thanks everyone for the frameworks and specific techniques!

Have a Question About This Topic?

Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is AI content gap analysis different from traditional keyword research?
Traditional keyword research finds search terms. AI gap analysis finds questions AI is answering that you’re not a source for. The approach is different: test actual AI queries in your space, see who gets cited, identify where competitors appear but you don’t. It’s about citation opportunity, not search volume.
What's the best method for finding AI content gaps?
Test 50-100 relevant prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. For each, note: who gets cited, what content format appears, what specific information AI extracts. Your gaps are topics where competitors get cited and you don’t, or where AI synthesizes from multiple sources because no single authority exists.
Should I prioritize high-volume keywords or AI citation opportunities?
For AI specifically, citation opportunity matters more than traditional search volume. A niche topic where you could be THE cited source may be more valuable than a high-volume keyword where you’re one of many. Consider: can you become the definitive source AI cites? That’s your opportunity.

Identify Your AI Content Gaps

Monitor which topics AI cites competitors for and discover content opportunities for your brand.

Learn more

AI Content Gap Analysis
AI Content Gap Analysis: Identify Content Gaps for AI Visibility

AI Content Gap Analysis

Learn what AI Content Gap Analysis is and how to identify content gaps to improve your visibility in AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and generative search engines. Disco...

9 min read