How often are AI crawlers hitting your site? What are you seeing in logs?
Community discussion on AI crawler frequency and behavior. Real data from webmasters tracking GPTBot, PerplexityBot, and other AI bots in their server logs.
I’ve been asked to analyze our AI crawler traffic. The marketing team wants to understand:
My challenges:
Questions for the community:
Anyone with technical experience here?
Here’s a comprehensive AI crawler identification guide:
Known AI Crawler User Agents (2025-2026):
| Crawler | Company | User Agent Contains |
|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | OpenAI | GPTBot |
| ChatGPT-User | OpenAI | ChatGPT-User |
| Google-Extended | Google-Extended | |
| ClaudeBot | Anthropic | ClaudeBot, anthropic-ai |
| PerplexityBot | Perplexity | PerplexityBot |
| CCBot | Common Crawl | CCBot |
| Meta-ExternalAgent | Meta | Meta-ExternalAgent |
| Applebot-Extended | Apple | Applebot-Extended |
| Bytespider | ByteDance | Bytespider |
| YouBot | You.com | YouBot |
| Cohere-ai | Cohere | cohere-ai |
Log analysis regex (Apache/Nginx format):
GPTBot|ChatGPT-User|Google-Extended|ClaudeBot|anthropic-ai|PerplexityBot|CCBot|Meta-ExternalAgent|Bytespider
Important note:
Not all AI systems announce themselves. Some use generic user agents or proxy through services. This list catches the honest crawlers.
Estimating hidden AI crawler traffic:
Signals of potential hidden AI crawlers:
Unusual traffic patterns
Suspicious user agents
IP analysis
Analysis approach:
-- Find potential hidden crawlers
SELECT
user_agent,
COUNT(*) as requests,
COUNT(DISTINCT path) as unique_pages,
AVG(time_between_requests) as avg_interval
FROM access_logs
WHERE
user_agent NOT LIKE '%GPTBot%'
AND user_agent NOT LIKE '%Googlebot%'
-- other known bots
GROUP BY user_agent
HAVING
requests > 1000
AND avg_interval < 1 -- Very fast
AND unique_pages > 100
Reality check:
Hidden crawlers probably add 20-30% more AI traffic beyond identified crawlers. But you can only control what you can see.
Practical log analysis workflow:
Step 1: Extract AI crawler hits
# Nginx log format
grep -E "GPTBot|ChatGPT|Google-Extended|ClaudeBot|PerplexityBot" access.log > ai_crawlers.log
Step 2: Analyze by crawler
# Count requests per crawler
awk '{print $NF}' ai_crawlers.log | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
Step 3: Analyze pages crawled
# Most crawled pages
awk '{print $7}' ai_crawlers.log | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -50
Step 4: Analyze timing patterns
# Requests per hour
awk '{print $4}' ai_crawlers.log | cut -d: -f2 | sort | uniq -c
What to look for:
| Pattern | Indicates |
|---|---|
| Daily visits | Active crawling, good sign |
| Focus on blog/content | Content being considered |
| sitemap.xml requests | Following your guidance |
| robots.txt checks | Respecting guidelines |
| Focus on one section | Selective crawling |
Security angle on AI crawler analysis:
Verifying legitimate AI crawlers:
Not all traffic claiming to be GPTBot actually is. Spoofers exist.
Verification methods:
host 20.15.240.10
# Should resolve to openai.com for GPTBot
host crawl-20-15-240-10.openai.com
# Should return the same IP
| Crawler | IP Ranges |
|---|---|
| GPTBot | 20.15.240.0/24, various Azure ranges |
| Googlebot | 66.249.x.x, 64.233.x.x |
| Anthropic | Published in their docs |
Why this matters:
Automated verification script:
def verify_crawler(ip, claimed_agent):
# Reverse lookup
hostname = socket.gethostbyaddr(ip)[0]
# Forward lookup
verified_ip = socket.gethostbyname(hostname)
return ip == verified_ip and expected_domain in hostname
Reporting framework for marketing team:
What marketing actually wants to know:
Monthly report template:
AI Crawler Summary - [Month]
Overall:
- Total AI crawler requests: X
- Change from last month: +/-Y%
- Unique pages crawled: Z
By Crawler:
| Crawler | Requests | Unique Pages |
|--------------|----------|--------------|
| GPTBot | X | Y |
| PerplexityBot| X | Y |
| ... | ... | ... |
Top Crawled Pages:
1. /blog/popular-article (X requests)
2. /product-page (Y requests)
3. ...
Observations:
- [Notable pattern]
- [Recommendation]
Action Items:
- [ ] Ensure [page type] is crawlable
- [ ] Investigate [anomaly]
Keep it simple.
Marketing doesn’t need technical details. They need trends and implications.
Understanding AI crawler behavior patterns:
Training vs Retrieval crawlers:
| Characteristic | Training Crawler | Retrieval Crawler |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Infrequent (monthly) | Frequent (daily+) |
| Coverage | Wide (many pages) | Narrow (specific pages) |
| Depth | Deep (follows all links) | Shallow (top content) |
| User Agent | GPTBot, CCBot | ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot |
| Purpose | Build knowledge base | Answer specific queries |
What this means:
Analyzing crawler intent:
SELECT
user_agent,
COUNT(DISTINCT path) as pages_crawled,
COUNT(*) as total_requests,
COUNT(*) / COUNT(DISTINCT path) as avg_hits_per_page
FROM ai_crawler_logs
GROUP BY user_agent
High pages/low hits = broad training crawl Low pages/high hits = focused retrieval
This has been incredibly helpful. Here’s my analysis plan:
Immediate analysis (this week):
Extract AI crawler logs
Basic metrics
Verification
Ongoing monitoring:
Weekly automated report
Monthly trend analysis
Report for marketing:
Focus on:
Tools I’ll use:
Thanks everyone for the detailed technical guidance.
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Understand how AI crawler activity translates to actual AI visibility. Track your brand across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other platforms.
Community discussion on AI crawler frequency and behavior. Real data from webmasters tracking GPTBot, PerplexityBot, and other AI bots in their server logs.
Community discussion on AI crawler frequency patterns. Real data on how often GPTBot, PerplexityBot, and ClaudeBot visit websites.
Community discussion on tools that check AI crawlability. How to verify GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot can access your content.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.