How to Validate Schema Markup: Complete Guide to Structured Data Testing
Learn how to validate schema markup and structured data using Google tools, Schema.org validators, and best practices. Ensure your JSON-LD is machine-readable a...
I’ve been implementing schema markup across our site but validation is confusing. Different tools give different results, and I’m not sure which errors actually matter.
My confusion:
What I need help with:
Anyone have a clear validation workflow?
Let me clarify the validation landscape:
The tools and their purposes:
| Tool | Purpose | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Rich Results Test | Google-specific validation | Checking rich result eligibility |
| Schema Markup Validator | Schema.org compliance | General schema validation |
| Search Console | Site-wide monitoring | Finding systemic issues |
| Screaming Frog | Bulk validation | Large site audits |
| test.schema.dev | Strict validation | Extra thorough checking |
Why results differ:
Rich Results Test:
Schema Markup Validator:
The workflow:
Step 1: Rich Results Test Check if you’re eligible for rich results. Fix any errors shown here first.
Step 2: Schema Markup Validator Validate against Schema.org standards. Catch additional issues.
Step 3: Search Console Monitor ongoing compliance. Spot site-wide problems.
Both tools should pass for confidence.
Critical distinction: Errors vs. Warnings
ERRORS (must fix):
Parsing errors:
Missing required properties:
Invalid property values:
Non-existent properties:
WARNINGS (evaluate):
Missing recommended properties:
Best practice suggestions:
Decision framework:
| Issue Type | Impact | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Parsing error | Critical | Fix immediately |
| Missing required | Blocks features | Fix immediately |
| Invalid value | May break | Fix promptly |
| Missing recommended | Suboptimal | Evaluate and fix if applicable |
| Best practice | Minor | Fix when time permits |
The rule: All errors = must fix. Warnings = evaluate if property applies to your content.
Common syntax errors and how to fix them:
Error 1: Wrong quotation marks
Bad:
"name": "Article Title"
(These are curly quotes from Word/Google Docs)
Good:
"name": "Article Title"
(These are straight quotes)
Fix: Never write JSON in Word. Use code editor.
Error 2: Missing or extra commas
Bad:
{
"name": "Title",
"author": "John"
"date": "2025-12-31"
}
(Missing comma after author)
Good:
{
"name": "Title",
"author": "John",
"date": "2025-12-31"
}
Error 3: Trailing comma
Bad:
{
"name": "Title",
"author": "John",
}
(Comma after last property)
Good:
{
"name": "Title",
"author": "John"
}
Error 4: Unbalanced brackets
Count opening and closing brackets. Every { needs matching }. Every [ needs matching ].
Pro tip: Use a JSON validator like jsonlint.com first. Catches syntax before schema-specific issues.
FAQ schema is most common - here’s how to validate it correctly:
Required structure:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is the question?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The complete answer text here."
}
}]
}
Common FAQ schema errors:
1. Content mismatch: Schema Q&A must match visible page content. Can’t have schema-only Q&A.
2. Hidden content: FAQ content behind tabs/accordions may not validate. Some implementations require JS rendering.
3. Multiple FAQ schemas: Usually one FAQPage per page. Multiple can confuse validators.
4. Missing Answer text: Every Question needs acceptedAnswer. acceptedAnswer needs text property.
Validation checklist for FAQ:
Testing:
Article schema tips for AI visibility:
Essential Article schema:
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "Your Article Title",
"datePublished": "2025-12-30",
"dateModified": "2025-12-31",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Author Name",
"url": "https://yoursite.com/author/name"
},
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Your Company",
"logo": {
"@type": "ImageObject",
"url": "https://yoursite.com/logo.png"
}
},
"image": "https://yoursite.com/image.jpg"
}
Why each property matters for AI:
| Property | AI Benefit |
|---|---|
| headline | Content identification |
| datePublished | Freshness signal |
| dateModified | Currency indicator |
| author | E-E-A-T signal |
| publisher | Authority signal |
| image | Rich presentation |
Common Article errors:
Missing author: Google recommends but doesn’t require. AI systems use for credibility.
Date format wrong: Must be ISO 8601: “2025-12-31” Not: “December 31, 2025”
Publisher logo missing: Required for some rich results. Should be valid URL to actual image.
dateModified older than datePublished: Logically impossible. Systems may flag or ignore.
The AI connection: Good Article schema helps AI understand and trust your content. Author and date are especially important for citations.
How to validate schema at scale:
For large sites (100+ pages):
Option 1: Screaming Frog
Option 2: Search Console
Option 3: Custom scripts
Prioritization framework:
| Priority | Issue Type | Action |
|---|---|---|
| P1 | Template errors (affect many pages) | Fix template immediately |
| P2 | High-traffic page errors | Fix individually |
| P3 | Low-traffic page errors | Batch fix |
| P4 | Warnings | Address in next sprint |
Template issues are critical: If your blog template has schema error, Every blog post has that error. Fix template = fix hundreds of pages.
Our workflow:
How schema specifically helps AI visibility:
Why schema matters for AI:
Explicit structure: AI systems don’t have to guess. Schema tells them exactly what content is.
Relationship clarity: Author → Article → Publisher AI understands the connections.
Data extraction: FAQPage = clear Q&A pairs. AI can extract and cite accurately.
Schema types most valuable for AI:
| Schema Type | AI Benefit | Use For |
|---|---|---|
| FAQPage | Direct Q&A extraction | FAQ sections |
| Article | Content identification | Blog posts, articles |
| HowTo | Step extraction | Tutorials |
| Organization | Entity recognition | About pages |
| Person | Author authority | Author pages |
Our testing: Pages with schema vs. without schema. Same content, same structure. Schema pages: 35% more AI citations.
The caveat: Schema alone doesn’t guarantee citations. Content quality still primary. Schema helps AI understand quality content.
Validation for AI: Focus on FAQPage and Article schema. Ensure clean, error-free implementation. Test that content matches schema.
My complete validation workflow:
Pre-publish validation:
Step 1: JSON syntax check Use jsonlint.com Catches basic syntax before deployment.
Step 2: Schema Markup Validator Paste code at validator.schema.org Check Schema.org compliance.
Step 3: Rich Results Test Test with Google’s tool. Verify rich result eligibility.
Step 4: Preview check See how rich result will appear. Ensure it looks correct.
Post-publish validation:
Step 1: Test live URL Rich Results Test with actual URL. Confirms schema renders correctly.
Step 2: Search Console monitoring Wait 2-3 days for indexing. Check Enhancements reports.
Step 3: Rich result appearance Search for page. Verify rich results appear.
Ongoing monitoring:
Quick checklist:
Quick fixes for common validation issues:
“Missing required property” Check which property is required for your schema type. Add the missing property. Google’s documentation lists requirements.
“Invalid property value” Usually date format or URL issues. Dates: Use ISO 8601 (2025-12-31) URLs: Use full absolute URLs (https://…)
“Property not recognized” Typo in property name. Check exact spelling at schema.org. Case-sensitive: “datePublished” not “DatePublished”
“Invalid JSON-LD syntax” Run through jsonlint.com. Check quotes, commas, brackets. Compare to working examples.
“Content not on page” Schema references content not visible. Either add content or remove from schema. Can’t have invisible schema content.
“Multiple items on same page” Usually fine, but check organization. Use @graph for multiple items if needed. Ensure each has complete required properties.
Tool for debugging: Chrome extension: “Structured Data Testing Tool” Right-click any page to test instantly.
When stuck: Compare to Google’s examples. Strip back to minimal valid schema. Add properties back one by one.
Much clearer now. My validation workflow:
Pre-publish:
Post-publish:
Error priority:
For my site:
Key insight: Errors must be fixed. Warnings are optional based on content. Multiple tools give complete picture.
Thanks for demystifying schema validation.
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor how your structured data helps AI systems cite your content. See which pages with schema markup get the most AI visibility.
Learn how to validate schema markup and structured data using Google tools, Schema.org validators, and best practices. Ensure your JSON-LD is machine-readable a...
Community discussion on schema markup for AI visibility. Real experiences from developers and SEOs on which structured data types improve AI citations.
Community discussion on whether Article Schema and structured data actually impact AI citations in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.