Let me save you the pain we went through. These mistakes cost us 6 months and significant budget.
Mistake 1: Treating it like keyword SEO We stuffed keywords. AI doesn’t care. Citation rate: 5%
Mistake 2: Ignoring author credibility Anonymous content everywhere. AI ignored us.
Mistake 3: Publishing thin content fast 50 pieces in 2 months. All useless. AI cited none.
Mistake 4: Not setting up monitoring Flew blind for 4 months. No idea what was working.
Mistake 5: Blocking AI crawlers Our robots.txt blocked Perplexity. Oops.
Mistake 6: Inconsistent entity info Different company descriptions everywhere. AI confused.
Mistake 7: Expecting immediate results Leadership got impatient at month 2. Program nearly cancelled.
What we do now (working):
Share your mistakes so others can learn!
I’ve seen all these mistakes and more. Let me categorize them.
Content mistakes:
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Keyword stuffing | AI reads meaning, not keywords | Write naturally |
| Thin content | Nothing unique to cite | Add original value |
| Duplicate/spun | AI detects it | Create original |
| No structure | Hard to extract | Clear hierarchy |
Technical mistakes:
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Blocking crawlers | AI can’t see content | Check robots.txt |
| JS-only rendering | Many AI bots don’t render JS | Use SSR |
| Slow pages | Crawlers timeout | Optimize speed |
| Missing schema | Entity data unclear | Implement markup |
Strategic mistakes:
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| No monitoring | Can’t improve blind | Set up day 1 |
| Scattered topics | No authority built | Focus on clusters |
| Anonymous authors | No credibility signal | Use real experts |
| Short timeline | Premature pivot | Plan 12+ months |
Every mistake has a pattern. Learn the patterns.
The robots.txt mistake is more common than people think.
What we found:
Default WordPress security plugins often block:
How to check:
# Test your robots.txt
curl https://yoursite.com/robots.txt
# Look for:
User-agent: PerplexityBot
Disallow: /
# This blocks Perplexity
The fix:
Explicitly allow AI crawlers:
User-agent: PerplexityBot
Allow: /
User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Allow: /
Our situation:
Blocked AI crawlers for 6 months without knowing. Zero Perplexity citations. Fixed robots.txt. Citations started within 2 weeks.
Check your robots.txt TODAY.
The thin content lesson was expensive for us.
What we did wrong:
Hired cheap writers to produce 100 articles in 3 months. Each article:
The result:
100 articles. 3 AI citations total.
What we do now:
20 articles in same timeframe:
The new result:
20 articles. 12 AI citations (60% rate).
The math:
| Approach | Cost | Citations | Cost per Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheap/volume | $10K | 3 | $3,333 |
| Quality/focused | $12K | 12 | $1,000 |
Quality is actually cheaper per outcome.
Entity inconsistency killed our AI visibility:
What we had:
What AI saw:
“Are these the same company? Unclear. Don’t cite.”
The fix:
The impact:
Before: AI couldn’t identify us reliably After: AI recognizes us as single entity
Timeline:
Fix took 2 weeks. AI recognition improved within 6 weeks.
Check your entity consistency across:
The timeline expectations mistake is organizational:
What happens:
Month 1: “Let’s do AI visibility!” Month 2: “Why aren’t we appearing?” Month 3: “This isn’t working, cut budget”
The reality:
Month 1-3: Foundation building Month 4-6: First real visibility Month 7-12: Business impact
How to prevent:
Before starting, get alignment on:
Our presentation approach:
“AI visibility is infrastructure. Like building a factory, not running an ad. We’re building something that compounds.”
Set expectations early or fail fast.
Not monitoring from day 1 is a critical mistake:
What we missed by not monitoring:
Didn’t know what was working
Didn’t see competitor movement
Couldn’t prove progress
Set up monitoring before creating content:
| Tool | Purpose | When |
|---|---|---|
| Am I Cited | AI citations | Day 1 |
| GSC | Search data | Day 1 |
| GA4 | Traffic patterns | Day 1 |
| Brand tracking | SOV | Week 1 |
The cost of not monitoring:
We spent 4 months creating content without data. 60% of it was the wrong approach. That’s 60% wasted budget.
Monitor first, optimize second.
Our author mistake was expensive:
What we did:
All content published as “Staff Writer” or “Marketing Team”
What happened:
8% citation rate across all content
What we changed:
Same content, added real author names with:
New results:
24% citation rate - same content, different authorship
The lesson:
AI evaluates WHO created content, not just WHAT is in it.
For YMYL topics:
The difference was even bigger:
Author investment pays off immediately.
Amazing thread. Here’s the complete mistake prevention checklist:
Before Starting:
Content Strategy:
Author Strategy:
Technical:
Ongoing:
The meta-lesson:
Most mistakes come from applying old SEO thinking to new AI reality. AI isn’t keyword matching - it’s meaning matching.
Thanks everyone for sharing your expensive lessons!
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor your AI search performance and catch issues before they hurt your visibility.
Community discussion on fixing low AI visibility scores. Real experiences from marketers on diagnosing and improving AI search presence quickly.
Community discussion on recovering from poor AI visibility. Real experiences from brands that went from invisible to visible in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google ...
Community discussion on maintaining long-term AI visibility. Real strategies from marketers who sustained and grew their AI citations over time rather than seei...
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.