AI爬虫会渲染JavaScript吗?我们的网站基于React,我有点担心
社区讨论AI爬虫对JavaScript渲染的能力。开发者分享了他们在React、Next.js及其他JS框架下实现AI可见性的经验。
We just discovered why we’re invisible to ChatGPT and Perplexity - our entire site is React SPA with client-side rendering.
The problem:
What I’ve learned:
The solution I’m considering:
Has anyone implemented dynamic rendering specifically for AI visibility? Did it work? How long before you saw improvements in AI citations?
Marcus, we went through this exact journey six months ago. Dynamic rendering was a game-changer for our AI visibility.
Our implementation:
| Approach | Pros | Cons | Our Experience |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prerender.io | Easy setup, managed | Monthly cost | Used for 3 months |
| Rendertron | Free, self-hosted | Requires infra | Current solution |
| Next.js SSR | Best long-term | Full rewrite | Future plan |
| Static Generation | Fastest | Limited dynamic | Partial use |
Results after implementing Rendertron:
Key insight:
The critical part is user agent detection. You need to route these specific bots to pre-rendered pages:
Don’t forget to keep your cached pages fresh. Stale content is worse than no content.
98% success rate is incredible. How are you handling cache invalidation? We have content that updates frequently - product prices, availability, etc.
And did you see any impact on your hosting costs with Rendertron?
Cache invalidation strategy:
Cost impact:
Running Rendertron on AWS:
Compare to Prerender.io:
For frequently changing content like prices, we render on-demand with short TTL (1 hour) and cache at CDN level. The AI crawlers don’t visit that frequently anyway - maybe a few times per day.
Pro tip: Log your AI crawler visits. You’ll be surprised how infrequent they actually are.
The JavaScript rendering gap is massive and most sites don’t realize it.
Research data:
From Vercel’s crawler study:
What AI crawlers actually fetch:
| Crawler | HTML % | JS Files % | Can Execute? |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | 57.7% | 11.5% | No |
| ClaudeBot | 35.4% | 23.8% | No |
| PerplexityBot | ~60% | ~15% | No |
| Googlebot | 100% | 100% | Yes |
The problem:
They fetch JavaScript files as text but can’t execute them. So if your content relies on JS execution, it’s invisible.
Critical check:
View your page source (not inspect element). If you see mostly empty divs and script tags, AI crawlers see the same thing.
We migrated from Create React App to Next.js specifically for this reason.
The migration path:
Before/After:
Before (CRA):
<div id="root"></div>
<script src="/static/js/main.chunk.js"></script>
After (Next.js):
<article>
<h1>Full content here</h1>
<p>All text visible to crawlers...</p>
</article>
Results:
The investment was worth it. Dynamic rendering is a band-aid. SSR/SSG is the proper fix.
One thing people miss: you need to actually verify AI crawlers are seeing your content.
How to test:
User agent testing:
curl -A "GPTBot" https://yoursite.com/page
Check for actual content:
Monitor in production:
Common failures we’ve seen:
| Issue | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Middleware misconfiguration | Wrong user agents | Update regex patterns |
| Cache serving old content | Stale info in AI | Reduce TTL |
| Render timeout | Partial content | Increase timeout |
| Auth walls | Blocked crawlers | Whitelist bot IPs |
Use Am I Cited to track if it’s working. You can monitor whether you start appearing in AI answers after implementing dynamic rendering. That’s the ultimate validation.
Performance considerations that matter:
Rendering latency:
AI crawlers have timeouts. If your pre-rendered page takes too long:
Optimization priorities:
Our metrics after optimization:
Don’t forget structured data. Your pre-rendered pages should include schema markup. AI crawlers extract this for understanding content.
For anyone on a tight budget, here’s the quick-win approach:
Minimal viable dynamic rendering:
Total cost: ~$10-15/month
Code structure:
Our results:
It’s not as robust as Prerender.io or Next.js, but it works for startups.
Client case study perspective:
Client situation:
Implementation:
Timeline:
Cost-benefit:
Key learning:
For large sites, the cache warming phase is critical. You can’t wait for AI crawlers to discover all your pages. Pre-render proactively.
Controversial take: maybe stop building JavaScript-heavy sites?
The broader picture:
Progressive enhancement:
Consider building sites that work without JavaScript, then enhance with JS:
Modern tools that help:
Dynamic rendering is a workaround for a problem we created. The real solution is building accessible-by-default.
This thread gave me a clear path forward. Here’s our plan:
Short-term (next 2 weeks):
Medium-term (next quarter):
Long-term (6 months):
Key metrics I’ll track:
The investment breakdown:
Thanks everyone. The data on crawler behavior and implementation details were exactly what I needed.
For anyone else with JS-heavy sites: this is no longer optional. AI crawlers are a significant traffic source and they can’t see your JavaScript content.
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
社区讨论AI爬虫对JavaScript渲染的能力。开发者分享了他们在React、Next.js及其他JS框架下实现AI可见性的经验。
关于 AI 搜索可见性的预渲染社区讨论。开发者分享了使用 JavaScript 框架和 AI 爬虫可访问性的经验。
社区讨论 JavaScript 如何影响 AI 爬取。开发者和 SEO 专业人士分享了测试 JavaScript 渲染对 ChatGPT 和 Perplexity 可见性的真实经验。...
Cookie 同意
我们使用 cookie 来增强您的浏览体验并分析我们的流量。 See our privacy policy.