Discussion Enterprise AI Search

Enterprise AI search strategy - how are large companies handling internal + external AI visibility?

EN
Enterprise_IT_Director_James · IT Director at Fortune 500
· · 103 upvotes · 10 comments
EI
Enterprise_IT_Director_James
IT Director at Fortune 500 · January 9, 2026

Leading our company’s AI search initiative and dealing with two parallel challenges:

Internal challenge:

  • Employees spend 2.5 hours daily searching for information
  • Data siloed across Sharepoint, Confluence, Salesforce, internal wikis
  • Need unified AI-powered search across all sources
  • Security and governance requirements are strict

External challenge:

  • Brand needs visibility when customers query AI platforms
  • Competitors are appearing in AI answers, we’re not
  • Marketing wants AI citation monitoring
  • Need to optimize our public content for AI

Current state:

ChallengeCurrent ApproachIssues
Internal searchLegacy search toolPoor results, low adoption
External visibilityTraditional SEONot translating to AI citations

Questions for the community:

  1. How are other enterprises balancing internal vs. external AI search?
  2. What platforms are you using for internal AI search?
  3. How do you handle governance at enterprise scale?
  4. Is anyone measuring ROI successfully?

Looking for practical insights from enterprise teams dealing with similar scope.

10 comments

10 Comments

ES
EnterpriseArchitect_Sarah Expert Chief Enterprise Architect · January 9, 2026

We’ve tackled both challenges at [Large Enterprise]. Here’s our architecture:

Internal AI Search:

Implemented federated search with RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation):

Sources: Sharepoint + Confluence + Salesforce + Internal DBs
     ↓
Connectors: Real-time sync with access control inheritance
     ↓
Vector Store: Embeddings for semantic search
     ↓
RAG Layer: Grounds LLM responses in source documents
     ↓
Interface: Natural language query + cited sources

Key results:

  • Search time reduced 60%
  • Employee NPS for search: 72 (was 18)
  • 45% reduction in repeated questions to experts

External AI Visibility:

Different team, different strategy:

  • Marketing owns GEO optimization
  • Content team restructures for conversational queries
  • Using Am I Cited for monitoring across platforms
  • Tracking share of voice vs. competitors

The governance layer spans both:

  • Access controls (who sees what)
  • Audit logging (compliance requirement)
  • Human review for sensitive decisions
  • Data residency controls
SM
SecurityArchitect_Mike · January 9, 2026
Replying to EnterpriseArchitect_Sarah

The governance layer is where most enterprises struggle.

Security concerns we addressed:

  1. Access inheritance - AI search respects source system permissions
  2. Data leakage - Can’t ask AI about documents you don’t have access to
  3. Audit trail - Every query logged for compliance
  4. Hallucination control - RAG with source citation requirements

The RAG benefit:

Without RAG, LLMs hallucinate 58-82% of the time on factual queries. With RAG grounded in internal docs, we’re at 17-23%.

That reduction is the difference between useful and dangerous for enterprise.

KL
KnowledgeManager_Lisa VP of Knowledge Management · January 9, 2026

Knowledge management perspective here. The internal search problem is organizational, not just technical.

Root causes:

  • Content scattered across 15+ platforms
  • No ownership of cross-functional content
  • Outdated documentation stays up forever
  • Tribal knowledge never gets documented

Technical solution isn’t enough:

We deployed a great AI search platform. Adoption was 30%.

Then we:

  1. Assigned content owners for every major topic
  2. Implemented content lifecycle (auto-archive after X months)
  3. Made content contribution part of performance reviews
  4. Created “knowledge champions” in each department

Adoption jumped to 78%.

For external AI visibility:

Same principle applies. You can’t optimize for AI if your content is a mess. Clean up and structure first, then optimize.

AT
AIProductManager_Tom Director of AI Products · January 8, 2026

Platform selection perspective. We evaluated 8 enterprise AI search platforms.

What matters:

FeatureWhy It Matters
Pre-built connectorsIntegration timeline
Security modelCan’t compromise on this
RAG qualityAccuracy of responses
CustomizationEnterprise-specific needs
ScalabilityPerformance at scale
Deployment optionsOn-prem vs. cloud needs

Top platforms we considered:

  • Glean (excellent UX, strong connectors)
  • Elasticsearch + custom LLM layer (maximum control)
  • Microsoft Copilot for 365 (if you’re all-Microsoft)
  • Coveo (strong e-commerce + knowledge)

Our choice:

Glean for most use cases + custom Elasticsearch for sensitive data that can’t leave our environment.

Hybrid approach let us move fast while meeting security requirements.

CE
CMO_Enterprise_Rachel CMO at Enterprise Software · January 8, 2026

Marketing perspective on external AI visibility.

The challenge:

Our competitors are getting cited in ChatGPT and Perplexity for category queries. We’re not. This is a brand problem, not just a traffic problem.

Our approach:

  1. Audit current state - Am I Cited to baseline visibility
  2. Content restructure - FAQ format for key topics
  3. Thought leadership - Executive content with clear expertise signals
  4. Third-party presence - Analyst relations, review sites, Reddit engagement

Metrics we track:

  • Share of voice in AI answers (vs. 5 competitors)
  • Sentiment of AI mentions
  • Citation sources (are we being cited directly or via third parties?)
  • Conversion rate from AI-referred traffic

Results after 6 months:

  • Share of voice: 8% → 22%
  • Direct brand citations up 180%
  • AI-referred traffic now 4% of total (growing)
CC
ChangeManager_Chris · January 8, 2026

Change management is the hidden challenge.

The workforce shift:

Employees are used to keyword search. AI search is conversational. The mental model change is significant.

What works:

  1. Training sessions - Not just “how to use” but “how to think about queries”
  2. Champions program - Power users who help their teams
  3. Executive sponsorship - Leadership using and advocating
  4. Quick wins communication - Share success stories widely

Common adoption blockers:

  • “I don’t trust AI answers” → Show source citations
  • “My old search worked fine” → Show side-by-side time savings
  • “I don’t know what to ask” → Provide example queries
  • “It’s one more tool” → Integrate into existing workflows

Target 60-80% adoption within 12 months. We’re at 72% after 10 months.

DM
DataGovernance_Maria · January 7, 2026

Data governance framework for AI search.

Policies we established:

  1. Data classification - What can AI access? (Public, Internal, Confidential, Restricted)
  2. Access inheritance - AI respects source system permissions
  3. Retention - How long are query logs kept?
  4. Cross-border - Data residency requirements by region
  5. Model training - Our data does NOT train vendor models

Implementation:

Data LevelAI AccessHuman Review Required
PublicFullNo
InternalFull (with permissions)No
ConfidentialRestricted queriesYes for external use
RestrictedNo AI accessN/A

Audit requirements:

  • Who queried what, when
  • What sources were used in response
  • Was response shared externally?
  • Quarterly access reviews
RJ
ROIAnalyst_Jake · January 7, 2026

Let’s talk ROI honestly.

Internal AI search ROI:

Average enterprise AI initiative ROI: 5.9% (IBM research)

That seems low, but it’s because many initiatives fail on adoption.

What successful implementations see:

  • 60% faster decision-making
  • 2-5 hours/week time savings per knowledge worker
  • 31% improvement in decision velocity
  • Reduced repeated questions to experts

How to calculate:

(Hours saved × hourly cost × employees) - (Platform cost + implementation)

For 10,000 knowledge workers saving 2 hours/week: = 10,000 × 2 × 52 × $50/hour = $52M value

  • Platform ($500K) - Implementation ($1M) = $50M+ annual value

External AI visibility ROI:

Harder to measure, but track:

  • AI-referred traffic and conversions
  • Brand search volume changes
  • Share of voice trends
  • Pipeline influenced by AI discovery

Start with leading indicators, move to revenue attribution over time.

FN
FutureOfWork_Nina · January 6, 2026

Looking ahead: agentic AI is coming.

Current state: AI answers questions Next state: AI takes actions based on answers

Enterprise implications:

  • AI search becomes AI workflow automation
  • Need governance for autonomous decisions
  • “What’s our policy?” becomes “Apply our policy”
  • Knowledge becomes execution

Prepare now:

  1. Clean, authoritative data (garbage in = garbage out)
  2. Clear policies (AI needs rules to follow)
  3. Workflow integration (not just search interface)
  4. Human oversight patterns (when does AI escalate?)

Companies building strong AI search foundations now will transition to agentic AI faster.

EI
Enterprise_IT_Director_James OP IT Director at Fortune 500 · January 6, 2026

Excellent discussion. Here’s our roadmap based on these insights:

Phase 1: Internal AI Search (Q1)

  • Deploy Glean for primary search
  • Custom RAG layer for sensitive systems
  • Access control inheritance from source systems
  • Change management program launch

Phase 2: Governance Framework (Q1-Q2)

  • Data classification for AI access
  • Audit logging implementation
  • Human-in-the-loop for confidential queries
  • Quarterly access reviews

Phase 3: External AI Visibility (Q2)

  • Marketing-led GEO initiative
  • Content restructure for conversational queries
  • Am I Cited monitoring deployment
  • Share of voice tracking vs. competitors

Phase 4: Measurement (Ongoing)

  • Internal: Adoption, time savings, decision velocity
  • External: Share of voice, citations, AI-referred conversions

Key success factors:

  • Executive sponsorship (have it)
  • Change management investment (budgeting for it)
  • Clean data foundation (work in progress)
  • Governance-first approach (non-negotiable)

Thanks everyone for the practical insights. This is exactly what we needed.

Have a Question About This Topic?

Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do enterprise companies approach AI search differently?
Enterprise companies address both internal AI search (employee knowledge discovery) and external AI search (brand visibility in public AI). They implement enterprise search platforms with RAG, federated search, and security controls while simultaneously optimizing external content for AI citation.
What's the ROI expectation for enterprise AI search?
Enterprise AI search ROI varies significantly. Internal implementations report 60% faster decision-making and 31% improvement in decision velocity, though overall ROI averages around 5.9% for enterprise-wide AI initiatives. External AI visibility ROI is measured through brand citations, sentiment, and conversion from AI traffic.
How do enterprises handle AI search governance?
Enterprises implement governance frameworks covering data residency, access controls, audit trails, and human-in-the-loop workflows. RAG architectures ground AI responses in verified source documents, reducing hallucination rates from 58-82% to 17-33%. Clear policies define what AI can access and how results are used.

Monitor Enterprise AI Visibility

Track how your enterprise brand appears across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude. Enterprise-grade AI visibility monitoring.

Learn more

How do you stay updated on AI search changes? Everything moves so fast

How do you stay updated on AI search changes? Everything moves so fast

Community discussion on staying current with AI search changes and GEO developments. Resources, newsletters, and strategies for keeping up with the fast-moving ...

6 min read
Discussion Industry Updates +1