How do AI engines actually decide what sources to trust? Is there an AI equivalent of domain authority?
Community discussion on how AI engines evaluate source trustworthiness. Understanding the trust factors that determine AI citations.
I’ve been doing SEO for 10 years, and the trust signal game feels completely different for AI.
What I’m observing:
We have a strong backlink profile - over 2,000 referring domains, DR 58, solid link velocity. In traditional SEO, we dominate.
But in AI answers? A competitor with half our backlinks gets cited 3x more often. They have:
My hypothesis: AI systems are less impressed by backlinks and more impressed by… something else. Brand recognition? Entity verification? Social proof?
What I want to understand:
Feeling like I need to unlearn some SEO assumptions here.
Your hypothesis is supported by data. Let me share what the research shows:
Correlation with AI Overview visibility:
| Signal | Correlation |
|---|---|
| Branded web mentions | 0.664 |
| Branded anchor text | 0.527 |
| Domain Rating | 0.392 |
| Branded search volume | 0.326 |
| Backlinks (raw count) | 0.218 |
Key insight: Mentions are 3x more predictive than backlinks.
Why this makes sense:
AI systems are trying to answer: “What sources would a knowledgeable human recommend?”
The “visibility cliff”:
Brands in the top 25% for web mentions get 10x more AI citations than the next quartile. Below median? Essentially zero mentions.
You need to cross a threshold of brand awareness before AI considers you citable.
This explains something I’ve noticed in PR.
We used to chase links from publications. Now I’m advising clients that a mention in a major publication - even without a link - may be more valuable for AI visibility than a link from a smaller site.
A TechCrunch mention that says “startups like [Brand] are pioneering…” creates a trust signal even without a link. AI systems read the content, see the association with “pioneer” and the trusted publication context.
The link building vs mention building distinction is real and important.
Let me explain the entity identity component, which is often overlooked:
AI systems build knowledge graphs - representations of entities and their relationships. When your brand has a clear entity identity, AI can:
How to build entity identity:
{
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "Your Company",
"sameAs": [
"https://linkedin.com/company/yourcompany",
"https://crunchbase.com/organization/yourcompany",
"https://twitter.com/yourcompany"
]
}
Consistent naming everywhere - Same company name on all profiles, directories, mentions
Wikipedia presence - Even a stub establishes you in major knowledge bases
Google Knowledge Panel - Claim and verify your business panel
The problem with weak entity identity:
If AI sees “Acme Inc” in one place, “Acme Incorporated” in another, and “Acme Corp” in a third, it may treat these as three different entities. Your trust signals get fragmented.
Reddit deserves special attention for AI trust signals.
The data: Reddit appears in 68% of AI Overview results, with citations increasing 450% between March and June 2025.
Why Reddit matters so much:
How to build Reddit presence authentically:
What NOT to do:
The goal isn’t “get mentioned on Reddit.” It’s “be genuinely helpful on Reddit and let mentions follow.”
E-E-A-T is getting more important for AI, not less. Here’s how to build each component:
Experience:
Expertise:
Authoritativeness:
Trustworthiness:
The AI-specific angle: AI systems can verify these signals across the web. Fake credentials or unverifiable claims get discounted. Authentic, consistent signals across platforms get amplified.
This is reshaping my mental model. Let me try to synthesize:
Old model (backlink-focused):
New model (trust signal-focused):
The fundamental shift: From “convince algorithms you’re authoritative” to “actually be recognized as authoritative by real people and systems.”
Is that the right framing?
That’s exactly right. And here’s the uncomfortable truth:
You can’t fake AI trust signals the way you could game backlinks.
Link building has always had shortcuts - PBNs, paid links, link exchanges. They worked because Google was pattern-matching.
AI systems are more holistic. They’re essentially asking: “Would a knowledgeable human recognize and trust this source?”
The strategy has to be: Actually build real authority, then make sure AI systems can see it.
Am I Cited is helpful here because it shows you exactly how AI systems perceive your brand - what they say about you, not just whether they mention you. That context reveals whether your trust building is working.
Practical actions we took to build AI trust signals:
Month 1-2: Entity foundation
Month 3-4: Mention building
Month 5-6: Community presence
Results after 6 months:
The timeline matters - this isn’t a quick fix. It’s building real recognition.
Technical trust signals that matter:
1. HTTPS everywhere - Basic but essential
2. Core Web Vitals - Fast, stable pages signal quality
3. Accessibility - Alt text, proper headings, good contrast
4. Clean HTML - Semantic markup, valid code
5. No dark patterns - Pop-ups, deceptive CTAs hurt trust
These might seem basic, but AI systems use them as quality filters. A site with poor technical signals may never get considered for citation regardless of content quality.
Think of it as table stakes - necessary but not sufficient for AI trust.
Amazing thread. Here’s my action plan:
Foundation (Immediate):
Mention Building (Months 1-3):
Community Presence (Ongoing):
Measurement:
Key mindset shift: Stop asking “how do we get more links?” and start asking “how do we become more genuinely recognized in our space?”
This is going to require cross-functional effort - PR, content, product, and executive involvement. But it’s clearly the direction AI is pushing us.
Perspective from someone who’s seen marketing cycles:
What you’re describing is actually marketing returning to fundamentals. Before the internet, trust was built through:
SEO created a shortcut game. AI is pushing back toward genuine authority signals.
The brands that will win in AI aren’t the best at optimization - they’re the ones that are actually trusted and recognized in their industries.
That’s good news if you focus on being genuinely excellent. Less good news if your strategy was mostly technical optimization.
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor how AI systems perceive your brand. See your citation frequency, share of voice, and competitive positioning across all major AI platforms.
Community discussion on how AI engines evaluate source trustworthiness. Understanding the trust factors that determine AI citations.
Learn how to increase AI trust signals across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Build entity identity, evidence, and technical trust to boost AI cit...
Community discussion on what sources AI engines trust most. Real experiences from marketers analyzing trust signals and citation patterns across AI platforms.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.