
Video, Wikipedia, Reddit - which content types actually get cited by AI platforms?
Community discussion on which content types get cited most by AI platforms. Real data on YouTube, Wikipedia, Reddit and other source preferences.
We analyzed 680 million+ AI citations. The results challenged everything we thought we knew.
The top cited sources overall:
| Source | Citation % | Dominant On |
|---|---|---|
| YouTube | 23.3% | Nearly every industry |
| Wikipedia | 18.4% | ChatGPT especially |
| Google.com | 16.4% | Support/dev content |
But platform-specific patterns differ dramatically:
The insight:
Only 11% of domains are cited by BOTH ChatGPT and Perplexity. Cross-platform optimization is essential.
Questions:
The platform divergence is real. Here’s how we approach it.
ChatGPT optimization (Wikipedia-heavy):
| Strategy | Impact |
|---|---|
| Wikipedia entry maintenance | High |
| Consistent entity information | High |
| Authoritative domain presence | Medium |
| Training data relevance | Medium |
Perplexity optimization (Reddit-heavy):
| Strategy | Impact |
|---|---|
| Authentic Reddit engagement | Very High |
| Real-time content freshness | High |
| Community presence | High |
| Clear source citations | Medium |
The 11% overlap problem:
We’ve found that brands need BOTH strategies running in parallel. Focusing on one platform leaves you invisible on the other.
Our allocation:
Wikipedia strategy details that worked for us:
What we did:
The result:
ChatGPT mentions went from 0 to regular citations within 3 months.
Key learning:
Wikipedia isn’t just about having an entry. It’s about:
Warning:
Don’t try to promote on Wikipedia. Editors catch it immediately. Keep it factual and let the authority build naturally.
The 6.6% Reddit citation rate for Perplexity is massive.
How we approach Reddit for AI visibility:
| Approach | Works | Doesn’t Work |
|---|---|---|
| Genuine problem-solving | Yes | Self-promotion |
| Sharing real experience | Yes | Generic advice |
| Data-backed insights | Yes | Vague claims |
| Engaging authentically | Yes | One-time posts |
Our Reddit presence strategy:
The timeline:
Month 1-3: Build karma and reputation Month 4-6: Occasional brand mentions when genuinely relevant Month 6+: AI citations start appearing
Warning:
Reddit communities detect and reject promotional content instantly. Authenticity isn’t optional.
YouTube at 23.3% surprised me. Here’s what we learned.
Why YouTube dominates:
Industry breakdown:
| Industry | YouTube Citation % |
|---|---|
| E-commerce | 32.4% |
| SEO | 39.1% |
| Finance | 23% |
| General | 23.3% |
Our YouTube strategy:
The result:
YouTube videos started appearing in AI citations within 6 weeks of publishing. Faster than any other content type.
Citation patterns vary dramatically by industry.
Health queries:
| Source | Citation % |
|---|---|
| NIH | 39% |
| Healthline | 15% |
| Mayo Clinic | 14.8% |
| Cleveland Clinic | 13.8% |
Finance queries:
| Source | Citation % |
|---|---|
| YouTube | 23% |
| Wikipedia | 7.3% |
| 6.8% | |
| Investopedia | 5.7% |
The pattern:
Implication:
Know your industry’s citation hierarchy. Optimize for the sources AI trusts in your specific vertical.
The domain type data is fascinating.
TLD citation breakdown:
| TLD | Citation % |
|---|---|
| .com | 80.41% |
| .org | 11.29% |
| .uk | ~1% |
| .io | 1.67% |
| .ai | 1.13% |
What this means:
Commercial domains (.com) still dominate AI citations massively. But .io and .ai domains are punching above their weight in tech verticals.
Our observations:
Recommendation:
Don’t switch domains for AI visibility. Focus on content quality and authority signals instead.
Excellent insights. Here’s my strategic framework.
The Multi-Platform Citation Strategy:
Tier 1 (Must have):
Tier 2 (High value):
Tier 3 (Supporting):
Platform-specific focus:
| Platform | Primary Strategy |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Wikipedia + authority signals |
| Perplexity | Reddit + content freshness |
| Google AI | YouTube + traditional SEO |
Content format recommendations:
| Content Type | Best Platform | Citation Likelihood |
|---|---|---|
| Tutorial video | YouTube | Very High |
| Comparison table | Your site | High |
| Expert opinion | Industry publication | High |
| Community discussion | Medium-High | |
| Definition page | Your site | Medium |
Monitor with Am I Cited to see which platforms cite you most.
Thanks everyone for the insights!
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor which of your pages get cited by AI engines and optimize your content strategy accordingly.

Community discussion on which content types get cited most by AI platforms. Real data on YouTube, Wikipedia, Reddit and other source preferences.

Discover which websites and pages get cited most frequently by AI systems like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Learn citation patterns, domain pre...

Learn how to reverse-engineer competitor AI citations and discover what content AI models prefer to cite. Strategic guide to competitive advantage in AI search.