Is JavaScript killing our AI visibility? AI crawlers seem to miss our dynamic content
Community discussion on how JavaScript affects AI crawling. Real experiences from developers and SEO professionals testing JavaScript rendering impact on ChatGP...
We just discovered why we’re invisible to ChatGPT and Perplexity - our entire site is React SPA with client-side rendering.
The problem:
What I’ve learned:
The solution I’m considering:
Has anyone implemented dynamic rendering specifically for AI visibility? Did it work? How long before you saw improvements in AI citations?
Marcus, we went through this exact journey six months ago. Dynamic rendering was a game-changer for our AI visibility.
Our implementation:
| Approach | Pros | Cons | Our Experience |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prerender.io | Easy setup, managed | Monthly cost | Used for 3 months |
| Rendertron | Free, self-hosted | Requires infra | Current solution |
| Next.js SSR | Best long-term | Full rewrite | Future plan |
| Static Generation | Fastest | Limited dynamic | Partial use |
Results after implementing Rendertron:
Key insight:
The critical part is user agent detection. You need to route these specific bots to pre-rendered pages:
Don’t forget to keep your cached pages fresh. Stale content is worse than no content.
98% success rate is incredible. How are you handling cache invalidation? We have content that updates frequently - product prices, availability, etc.
And did you see any impact on your hosting costs with Rendertron?
Cache invalidation strategy:
Cost impact:
Running Rendertron on AWS:
Compare to Prerender.io:
For frequently changing content like prices, we render on-demand with short TTL (1 hour) and cache at CDN level. The AI crawlers don’t visit that frequently anyway - maybe a few times per day.
Pro tip: Log your AI crawler visits. You’ll be surprised how infrequent they actually are.
The JavaScript rendering gap is massive and most sites don’t realize it.
Research data:
From Vercel’s crawler study:
What AI crawlers actually fetch:
| Crawler | HTML % | JS Files % | Can Execute? |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | 57.7% | 11.5% | No |
| ClaudeBot | 35.4% | 23.8% | No |
| PerplexityBot | ~60% | ~15% | No |
| Googlebot | 100% | 100% | Yes |
The problem:
They fetch JavaScript files as text but can’t execute them. So if your content relies on JS execution, it’s invisible.
Critical check:
View your page source (not inspect element). If you see mostly empty divs and script tags, AI crawlers see the same thing.
We migrated from Create React App to Next.js specifically for this reason.
The migration path:
Before/After:
Before (CRA):
<div id="root"></div>
<script src="/static/js/main.chunk.js"></script>
After (Next.js):
<article>
<h1>Full content here</h1>
<p>All text visible to crawlers...</p>
</article>
Results:
The investment was worth it. Dynamic rendering is a band-aid. SSR/SSG is the proper fix.
One thing people miss: you need to actually verify AI crawlers are seeing your content.
How to test:
User agent testing:
curl -A "GPTBot" https://yoursite.com/page
Check for actual content:
Monitor in production:
Common failures we’ve seen:
| Issue | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Middleware misconfiguration | Wrong user agents | Update regex patterns |
| Cache serving old content | Stale info in AI | Reduce TTL |
| Render timeout | Partial content | Increase timeout |
| Auth walls | Blocked crawlers | Whitelist bot IPs |
Use Am I Cited to track if it’s working. You can monitor whether you start appearing in AI answers after implementing dynamic rendering. That’s the ultimate validation.
Performance considerations that matter:
Rendering latency:
AI crawlers have timeouts. If your pre-rendered page takes too long:
Optimization priorities:
Our metrics after optimization:
Don’t forget structured data. Your pre-rendered pages should include schema markup. AI crawlers extract this for understanding content.
For anyone on a tight budget, here’s the quick-win approach:
Minimal viable dynamic rendering:
Total cost: ~$10-15/month
Code structure:
Our results:
It’s not as robust as Prerender.io or Next.js, but it works for startups.
Client case study perspective:
Client situation:
Implementation:
Timeline:
Cost-benefit:
Key learning:
For large sites, the cache warming phase is critical. You can’t wait for AI crawlers to discover all your pages. Pre-render proactively.
Controversial take: maybe stop building JavaScript-heavy sites?
The broader picture:
Progressive enhancement:
Consider building sites that work without JavaScript, then enhance with JS:
Modern tools that help:
Dynamic rendering is a workaround for a problem we created. The real solution is building accessible-by-default.
This thread gave me a clear path forward. Here’s our plan:
Short-term (next 2 weeks):
Medium-term (next quarter):
Long-term (6 months):
Key metrics I’ll track:
The investment breakdown:
Thanks everyone. The data on crawler behavior and implementation details were exactly what I needed.
For anyone else with JS-heavy sites: this is no longer optional. AI crawlers are a significant traffic source and they can’t see your JavaScript content.
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Track how GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot access your content. Ensure your dynamic rendering is working for AI visibility.
Community discussion on how JavaScript affects AI crawling. Real experiences from developers and SEO professionals testing JavaScript rendering impact on ChatGP...
Community discussion on optimizing Single Page Applications for AI search engines. Real solutions for making JavaScript-heavy sites visible to ChatGPT, Perplexi...
Community discussion on JavaScript rendering by AI crawlers. Developers share experiences with React, Next.js, and other JS frameworks for AI visibility.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.