Something interesting in our data that I want to discuss.
What we discovered:
We audited which of our content pages get cited most in AI responses (using Am I Cited).
The results shocked us:
| Content Type | % of AI Citations | % of Organic Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Feature comparisons | 42% | 8% |
| How-to guides | 23% | 31% |
| Product pages | 12% | 22% |
| Blog posts | 11% | 25% |
| Pricing pages | 8% | 14% |
| Other | 4% | - |
The insight:
Our comparison pages drive 5x their organic traffic weight in AI citations.
Why I think this is happening:
AI gets asked comparison questions constantly:
These queries naturally lead AI to cite comparison content.
My questions:
Yes, we’re seeing this across multiple clients. Comparison content is massively underrated for AI visibility.
Why comparisons perform so well:
Query match - Huge volume of AI queries are comparative (“X vs Y”, “best X for Y”)
Structure advantage - Tables and side-by-side formats are perfectly extractable for AI
Decision-stage content - AI users asking comparisons are often ready to buy
Comprehensive by nature - Good comparisons cover multiple dimensions AI can cite
The data from our portfolio:
Across 20 clients, comparison pages average:
The strategic implication:
Most companies have 5-10 comparison pages when they should have 50-100.
Every meaningful competitor pairing, every “vs” query, every “which is better” question should have dedicated comparison content.
Here’s the framework we use:
Comparison Content Matrix:
| Comparison Type | Volume Target | Update Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Your product vs main competitors | 5-10 pages | Monthly |
| Your product vs category alternatives | 5-10 pages | Quarterly |
| Feature-specific comparisons | 10-20 pages | Quarterly |
| Use-case specific | 10-20 pages | Bi-annually |
| Category overview comparisons | 5-10 pages | Quarterly |
The template approach:
Create a comprehensive comparison template:
Then populate for each comparison. The structure stays consistent; the data changes.
Scalability tips:
Quality control:
Product marketing perspective on comparison content ethics:
The concern: “Won’t comparison content where we rank ourselves favorably look biased?”
The reality: AI can detect obvious bias. Overly promotional comparisons don’t get cited.
What works:
Example transformation:
Before (biased): “Our product is better in every way. Competitors can’t match our features.”
After (credible): “Our product excels at X and Y, making it ideal for [use case]. Competitor A offers stronger Z, which may be better for [different use case]. Here’s a detailed breakdown…”
The counterintuitive truth:
Honest comparisons that acknowledge competitor strengths actually get MORE AI citations because they appear trustworthy.
AI systems are trained to recognize and deprioritize obvious marketing.
SEO perspective on comparison page structure:
What gets cited vs what ranks:
Interestingly, the format that ranks best in traditional SEO isn’t always what gets cited most in AI.
Traditional SEO optimization:
AI citation optimization:
The winning structure:
Title: [Product A] vs [Product B]: Complete Comparison for [Use Case]
TL;DR: [One-sentence verdict AI can quote]
Quick Comparison Table: [Feature matrix]
Detailed Analysis:
- Feature 1: [Winner and why]
- Feature 2: [Winner and why]
...
Best For:
- [Use case 1]: [Product recommendation]
- [Use case 2]: [Product recommendation]
...
Verdict: [Clear recommendation with reasoning]
The key:
Tables and verdict sections get cited. Long explanatory prose doesn’t.
Structure for extraction, not just comprehensiveness.
Let me share query data that explains this pattern:
ChatGPT query analysis (sample of 10,000 queries):
| Query Type | % of Queries | Typical Format |
|---|---|---|
| Informational | 35% | “What is X?” |
| Comparative | 28% | “X vs Y”, “Best X for Y” |
| How-to | 22% | “How do I X?” |
| Navigational | 10% | “Brand X website” |
| Other | 5% | - |
28% of AI queries are comparative!
That’s massive. And it explains why comparison content punches above its weight in citations.
User behavior insight:
People go to AI specifically for comparison help. They could Google for information, but they use AI to synthesize comparisons.
AI is becoming the default tool for “help me decide” queries.
The implication:
If you’re not creating comparison content, you’re invisible for 28% of relevant AI queries.
Competitive intelligence angle:
If you don’t create comparison content, competitors will.
And here’s what happens:
Real example:
Client A had no comparison content. Competitor B had “[Client A] vs [Competitor B]” pages.
When users asked AI to compare, Competitor B’s pages got cited 80% of the time.
The narrative was always: “Competitor B offers similar features with better pricing…”
The fix:
Client A created their own “[Client A] vs [Competitor B]” pages with balanced, credible comparisons.
AI citations shifted 60/40 in Client A’s favor within 3 months.
The lesson:
Own your comparisons or competitors will own them for you.
Operational perspective on maintaining comparison content:
The maintenance challenge:
Comparison content goes stale fast:
Our maintenance system:
Monthly competitor monitoring
Quarterly comparison audits
Annual strategic review
Automation tips:
The staffing reality:
One person can maintain 50 comparison pages with proper systems. 100+ requires dedicated resources or automation.
This thread has validated what our data was showing and given me a clear action plan.
Key insights confirmed:
Comparison content is AI gold - 28% of AI queries are comparative, and comparison content gets cited disproportionately
Credibility matters - Honest, balanced comparisons get cited more than biased marketing
Structure for extraction - Tables and verdict statements get cited; prose doesn’t
Own your narrative - If you don’t create comparisons, competitors control the story
Maintenance is critical - Outdated comparisons hurt more than no comparisons
Our action plan:
This month:
This quarter:
Ongoing:
The strategic shift:
We were treating comparison content as “nice to have.”
It’s actually our highest-performing content type for AI visibility.
Time to invest accordingly.
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor how your comparison and versus content performs in AI search. See which pages get cited when users ask AI for product recommendations.
Community discussion on which page types get cited most by AI. Real experiences from marketers on analyzing their content for AI citation patterns.
Community discussion on versus/comparison content for AI visibility. Real experiences from marketers on creating comparison content that AI systems prefer to ci...
Community discussion on how comparison pages perform in AI search. Real data and strategies from marketers optimizing comparison content for ChatGPT, Perplexity...
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.