AI monitoring tools comparison - which one actually works? Overwhelmed by options
Community discussion comparing AI monitoring tools. Marketing professionals share experiences, feature comparisons, and recommendations for AI visibility tracki...
I need to select an AI visibility monitoring tool and I’m overwhelmed by options.
What I need:
Tools I’ve looked at:
Questions:
Looking for honest reviews, not marketing speak.
I’ve tested all the major AI visibility tools. Here’s my honest comparison:
Tool comparison:
| Tool | Strength | Weakness | Price | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Am I Cited | Citation tracking, simplicity | Newer platform | $$ | SMBs, focused tracking |
| Otterly AI | GEO audits, established | Can be overwhelming | $$ | SEO teams |
| Cognizo | Automation, optimization | Complex setup | $$$ | Enterprise |
| Peec AI | Analytics, reporting | Limited optimization | $$ | Agencies |
| Profound | Enterprise features | Expensive | $$$$ | Fortune 500 |
| Rankability | Content integration | Less citation depth | $$ | Content teams |
Platform coverage:
| Tool | ChatGPT | Perplexity | Claude | Google AI | Gemini |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Am I Cited | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Otterly AI | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cognizo | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Peec AI | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Profound | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What actually matters:
Critical distinction:
Mention vs. Citation:
Why it matters:
Mentions build awareness but don’t drive traffic. Citations drive clicks AND build authority for future mentions.
Tool tracking:
| Tool | Tracks Mentions | Tracks Citations | Shows URLs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Am I Cited | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Otterly AI | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cognizo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Peec AI | Yes | Yes | Limited |
| Profound | Yes | Yes | Yes |
What to prioritize:
Track both, but focus optimization efforts on earning citations (with URLs). Mentions can be stepping stones to citations.
Bonus metric: Competitor share of voice
The best tools show not just YOUR visibility, but how you compare to competitors in the same queries. This is crucial for understanding your position.
Agency perspective - I’ve used multiple tools for different clients:
My honest experience:
Am I Cited:
Otterly AI:
Cognizo:
Peec AI:
My recommendation:
Start with free trials. Every tool has strengths; pick based on YOUR workflow.
In-house perspective - here’s what mattered to us:
Our selection criteria:
| Factor | Weight | Why It Mattered |
|---|---|---|
| Platform coverage | 25% | Need all major AI platforms |
| Data freshness | 20% | Competitive market |
| Actionable insights | 20% | Don’t have time for raw data |
| Price | 15% | Budget constraints |
| Ease of use | 10% | Non-technical team |
| Integration | 10% | Need to connect to other tools |
What we chose:
Am I Cited for citation tracking + Otterly AI for audits.
Using two tools might seem redundant, but:
What we track weekly:
What we track monthly:
Key insight:
No tool is perfect. Find one that fits your workflow, then build processes around it.
Enterprise requirements perspective:
What enterprises need that SMBs don’t:
Enterprise tool comparison:
| Feature | Profound | Cognizo | Otterly Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| SSO | Yes | Yes | Limited |
| Custom reports | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Dedicated support | Yes | Yes | Depends |
| Price range | $$$$$ | $$$$ | $$$ |
Our selection:
We went with Profound because:
The enterprise reality:
At enterprise scale, you’re not just buying a tool - you’re buying a vendor relationship. Support, reliability, and integration matter as much as features.
Practical approach - you don’t need the most expensive tool:
What I actually use (mid-size company):
Primary tool: Am I Cited ($50-100/mo range)
Supplemented with:
Monthly process:
Week 1: Review Am I Cited dashboard, note trends Week 2: Deep dive on top-performing/under-performing content Week 3: Competitor analysis Week 4: Optimization planning for next month
What I learned:
The honest truth:
Most features in expensive tools go unused. Start with what you’ll actually use, upgrade when you need more.
This has been incredibly helpful. Here’s my decision framework:
My requirements (prioritized):
My shortlist:
My evaluation plan:
What I’m prioritizing:
The insight I’m taking away:
Tool selection is less about features and more about fit. The best tool is the one my team will actually use consistently.
Thanks everyone for the honest comparisons!
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Track your brand across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. See who's citing you and who's not.
Community discussion comparing AI monitoring tools. Marketing professionals share experiences, feature comparisons, and recommendations for AI visibility tracki...
Community discussion comparing AI visibility monitoring tools. Real experiences with tracking brand presence across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews...
Discover the top AI search visibility monitoring tools to track your brand across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews. Compare features, pricing, and c...
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.