ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot - hur optimerar du för alla utan att bli galen?

Good news: there’s more overlap than difference. Here’s the framework:

80% is shared across platforms:

20% is platform-specific:

The strategy:

1. Nail the 80% shared fundamentals
2. Add platform-specific tweaks as resources allow
3. Prioritize platforms by audience match

You don’t need 5 programs. You need 1 core program with platform adjustments.

The unified core program:

Foundation (do once):

1. Robots.txt - Allow all AI crawlers

User-agent: GPTBot
Allow: /
User-agent: PerplexityBot
Allow: /
User-agent: ClaudeBot
Allow: /
User-agent: GoogleOther
Allow: /

2. Schema markup - Comprehensive, validated

3. Site structure - Logical, crawlable, fast

Content standards (apply to all content):

1. Answer-first format
2. Clear headings
3. Extractable sections
4. Original insights
5. Proper author attribution

Authority building (ongoing):

1. Third-party mentions
2. Review site presence
3. Community participation
4. Press coverage

This core covers 80%+ of what matters for all platforms.

Platform-specific work layers on top only if you have capacity.

This is reassuring. One core program with platform adjustments makes sense.

Question: When I DO have capacity for platform-specific work, what’s the highest-ROI activity for each?

Highest-ROI platform-specific activity:

ChatGPT:

• Quick win: Wikipedia presence (mention on relevant pages)
• ROI: High - Wikipedia is 27% of ChatGPT citations
• Time: Medium (Wikipedia has guidelines)

Perplexity:

• Quick win: Reddit presence (genuine participation)
• ROI: High - Reddit is 47% of Perplexity citations
• Time: Ongoing (authentic participation)

Google AI:

• Quick win: Win featured snippets
• ROI: Very high - Featured snippets often become AI content
• Time: Leverages existing SEO

Claude:

• Quick win: Add nuance and balance to content
• ROI: Medium - Claude is smaller but growing
• Time: Low (content refinement)

Copilot:

• Quick win: Set up Bing Webmaster Tools, check Bing rankings
• ROI: High for enterprise - Often overlooked, easy wins
• Time: Low (one-time setup)

If you can only do one platform-specific thing:

Google AI (featured snippets) - Biggest audience, leverages existing SEO.

On tracking multiple platforms efficiently:

Unified tracking approach:

Use Am I Cited or similar tool that tracks ALL platforms in one dashboard:

• ChatGPT
• Perplexity
• Google AI Overview
• Claude
• Copilot

What to track:

1. Per platform:

   • Citation frequency
   • Position when cited
   • Key queries

2. Comparative:

   • Share of voice vs competitors
   • Platform-by-platform performance
   • Trends over time

Review cadence:

• Weekly: Quick check of major changes
• Monthly: Platform comparison, trend analysis
• Quarterly: Strategic review, priority adjustment

Dashboard structure:

One view, all platforms, efficient review.

This is manageable. Let me synthesize:

Our approach:

Core program (80% of effort):

1. Technical foundation (robots.txt, schema, speed)
2. Content standards (answer-first, structured, authoritative)
3. Authority building (mentions, reviews, community)

Platform focus (15% of effort):

1. Google AI (primary - biggest audience)
2. ChatGPT (secondary - awareness)
3. Copilot (tertiary - enterprise audience)

Platform-specific quick wins (5% of effort):

• Google: Featured snippet optimization
• ChatGPT: Wikipedia presence
• Copilot: Bing Webmaster setup

Tracking:

• Am I Cited for unified view
• Weekly quick check
• Monthly analysis

This feels doable without drowning.

Team structure for multi-platform:

Small team (1-2 people):

• Focus on core program only
• Platform-specific work only if clearly high-value
• Unified tracking, not platform-by-platform

Medium team (3-5 people):

• Core program as foundation
• One person monitors platform-specific opportunities
• Targeted platform work based on data

Large team (5+ people):

• Core program team
• Platform specialists or rotation
• Comprehensive tracking and optimization

Regardless of size:

Don’t try to do everything. The core program gets you 80% of results. Platform-specific work is optimization, not requirement.

Start simple, expand as you learn what matters for YOUR brand.

Keep in mind: the landscape is changing.

What might change:

1. Platform consolidation (some may become dominant)
2. New platforms emerging
3. Source preferences shifting
4. Technical requirements evolving

What won’t change:

1. Quality content wins
2. Authority signals matter
3. Clear structure helps
4. Genuine expertise beats gaming

Strategic implication:

Invest in fundamentals that work everywhere. Platform-specific tactics may have shorter shelf life.

The brands that will win long-term are those with genuinely authoritative, well-structured content - not those who game specific platforms.

Final thought:

Multi-platform optimization isn’t about doing 5x the work. It’s about:

1. Doing the core work well (benefits all platforms)
2. Understanding platform differences (informs priorities)
3. Making smart bets (focus where your audience is)
4. Tracking efficiently (one view, all platforms)

If you’re overwhelmed, you’re probably over-complicating it.

The answer to “how do I optimize for 5 platforms?” is usually:

• Do the fundamentals really well
• Track everything in one place
• Add platform-specific work when you see clear ROI

Simplify, focus, measure, adjust.