How do you actually get executives to care about GEO? My boss thinks SEO is enough
Community discussion on getting executive buy-in for Generative Engine Optimization initiatives. Real experiences from marketing leaders on building business ca...
Feeling completely overwhelmed by GEO. Our CEO read somewhere that AI search is the future and now wants us to “optimize for AI” but we have limited resources and about 50 different things we could be doing.
We’re a B2B SaaS company with about 500 blog posts, decent traditional SEO, but we just ran an audit and we’re basically invisible in ChatGPT and Perplexity. When people ask “what’s the best [our category] software” we don’t even get mentioned.
Current chaos:
What I need to figure out:
Anyone who’s been through this successfully - how did you organize your GEO efforts?
I’ve helped about 20 companies through exactly this situation. Here’s the framework I use:
The Eisenhower Matrix for GEO:
Quadrant 1 - Urgent AND Important (do first):
Quadrant 2 - Important but NOT Urgent (schedule these):
Quadrant 3 - Urgent but NOT Important (delegate/minimize):
Quadrant 4 - Neither (skip these):
The mistake most teams make is jumping straight to content creation when they have technical barriers. If AI crawlers can’t access your site properly, nothing else matters.
This framework saved us. We were spending 80% of our time on Quadrant 3 stuff - tweaking meta descriptions, minor content updates.
When we audited our server logs, we discovered GPTBot was hitting a 403 error on half our site. Fixing that one issue improved our AI visibility more than 6 months of content work.
My addition to the framework: Before doing anything, check your server logs for AI crawler activity. If you’re not seeing GPTBot, PerplexityBot, and ClaudeBot regularly crawling your key pages, start there.
Apply the Pareto Principle religiously.
The 80/20 of GEO:
We identified our top 15 pages by traffic and revenue impact. Restructured just those 15 for AI extractability - clear headings, answer-first paragraphs, comparison tables.
Result: 35% improvement in AI citation rate in 6 weeks. Way better ROI than trying to optimize 500 pages simultaneously.
Similar situation here. What worked for us was a phased approach:
Phase 1 (Week 1-2): Foundation
Phase 2 (Week 3-6): Quick Wins
Phase 3 (Week 7-12): Authority Building
The key insight: We used Am I Cited to track which prompts triggered competitor mentions but not ours. That showed us exactly where to focus content efforts. Don’t guess - measure.
As someone who pushed back hard on “restructure everything,” here’s the content prioritization that actually works:
Priority 1: Decision-stage content Pages where people are ready to buy. “Best [category] software” pages, comparison pages, pricing pages. These drive 10-15x more revenue than awareness content even though they get less traffic.
Priority 2: Your unique expertise Content where you have genuine authority - original research, case studies, methodology explanations. AI values unique sources.
Priority 3: High-traffic informational content Restructure for AI extractability, but don’t obsess. Awareness content matters less for conversions.
Skip entirely:
Map your content to customer journey stages. Optimize decision-stage first, even if awareness content has more traffic.
Technical prioritization is straightforward:
Day 1 fixes:
Week 1 fixes:
Month 1 fixes:
Everything else can wait. These technical fundamentals unlock everything else. I’ve seen sites go from 0 AI mentions to 15+ just by fixing crawler access.
The data on mentions vs backlinks changed our entire prioritization:
Web mentions: 0.664 correlation with AI visibility Backlinks: 0.218 correlation with AI visibility
Mentions are 3x more impactful. Yet most teams still allocate 70% of resources to link building.
Our mention-building prioritization:
We flipped our resource allocation: 70% mentions, 30% links. AI visibility improved faster than traditional SEO rankings.
Your CEO wants results in 90 days? Here’s exactly what to prioritize:
Days 1-14: Baseline & Technical
Days 15-45: Content Quick Wins
Days 46-75: Authority Building
Days 76-90: Measure & Report
This timeline is aggressive but realistic. We saw 40% visibility improvement in 90 days following this plan.
I was skeptical about all this prioritization talk until I saw the data.
What actually moved our visibility:
What didn’t move visibility:
The biggest lesson: Measure before optimizing. Use actual visibility data to prioritize, not assumptions about what should work.
When you’re a team of one (or close to it), here’s the brutal prioritization:
Week 1:
Week 2-4:
Month 2:
Month 3:
That’s it. Ignore everything else until these are done. Trying to do more with limited resources just means nothing gets done well.
This thread is gold. Here’s my action plan based on everyone’s input:
My prioritization framework:
First: Technical foundation (Week 1)
Second: Quick wins (Week 2-4)
Third: Content gaps (Month 2)
Fourth: Mentions (Month 2-3)
Key insight I’m taking: Stop trying to boil the ocean. 80/20 everything. The Eisenhower Matrix is now my new religion.
Presenting this to leadership Monday. Thank you all.
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor how your optimization efforts translate to AI visibility. Track brand mentions, citation positions, and visibility scores across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI.
Community discussion on getting executive buy-in for Generative Engine Optimization initiatives. Real experiences from marketing leaders on building business ca...
Community discussion on getting started with Generative Engine Optimization. Real experiences from marketers on day-one priorities and building a GEO foundation...
Community discussion on building the business case for Generative Engine Optimization. Real strategies from marketers who successfully got executive buy-in for ...
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.