79% of buyers use AI for purchase decisions - how do we get our brand recommended?
Community discussion on optimizing for purchase decisions in AI. Real strategies from brands who improved their visibility in AI-generated product recommendatio...
I’m focused on the consideration phase of our buyer journey - when prospects are actively evaluating solutions.
The old consideration phase:
The new consideration phase:
My concern: If we’re not in that AI response, we’re eliminated before we know they’re looking.
Questions:
This feels like the highest-stakes part of the buyer journey for AI visibility.
You’re right - consideration phase is highest stakes. Here’s the framework:
Consideration phase AI queries:
| Query Pattern | Example | Intent |
|---|---|---|
| “Best [category] for [use case]” | “Best CRM for small sales teams” | Seeking recommendation |
| “[Product A] vs [Product B]” | “Salesforce vs HubSpot” | Direct comparison |
| “Alternatives to [Product]” | “Alternatives to Salesforce” | Evaluating options |
| “[Category] comparison” | “CRM software comparison” | Comprehensive evaluation |
| “How to choose [category]” | “How to choose a CRM” | Seeking criteria |
| “[Product] for [industry]” | “Best CRM for real estate” | Specific fit |
Content that wins these queries:
The key insight:
AI wants to help users make informed decisions. Content that genuinely helps comparison wins. Content that only promotes you loses.
On comparison content specifically:
What NOT to do:
What WORKS:
Example structure:
“[Your product] vs [Competitor]: Honest comparison
[Your product] excels at: A, B, C [Competitor] excels at: D, E, F
Choose [Your product] if: [specific use cases] Choose [Competitor] if: [specific use cases]
For [target audience], we recommend [honest recommendation]”
AI cites content that actually helps users decide, not content that pretends to compare.
On including competitors - this was controversial internally.
The debate:
Against: “Why would we promote competitors on our site?” For: “If we don’t compare, others will, and we won’t be in AI responses.”
What we decided:
We created comparison content that:
The result:
For “[Our product] vs [Competitor]” queries:
The key:
AI was going to answer these queries anyway. Better to be the source (on our domain) than to let third-party sites (or competitors) control the narrative.
By creating honest comparisons, we became the authority AI trusts for these queries.
That makes sense. We control the narrative better by creating the comparison ourselves.
Question: What about “best X for Y” queries where I want us to be recommended? How do I optimize for those specifically?
“Best X for Y” optimization:
Step 1: Identify your winning use cases
You won’t be best for everything. Identify where you genuinely excel:
Step 2: Create dedicated use case content
For each winning use case, create:
Step 3: Build proof
AI looks for validation:
Step 4: Be specific, not broad
Instead of: “We’re the best CRM.” Claim: “We’re the best CRM for teams under 10 that prioritize simplicity.”
Specific claims are more citable and more believable.
The framework:
Win narrow, expand gradually. Own specific “best for” queries before trying to own broad ones.
Buying guides are consideration phase gold.
Why they work:
When someone asks AI “how do I choose a CRM?”, AI looks for comprehensive buying guidance. If you have the best guide, you get cited.
Buying guide structure:
Include your product:
Position yourself as one option within the guide: “Solutions like [Your product], [Competitor A], and [Competitor B] all address these needs. [Your product] is particularly strong for [specific use case].”
Why this wins:
Great insights. Here’s my content plan:
Comparison Content:
Use Case Content:
Buying Guide:
All with:
Timeline: 3 months to create, then measure and refine.
How to measure consideration phase success:
Metrics to track:
Citation rate for comparison queries
Position in citations
Competitive share of voice
Content-level performance
Am I Cited can track:
Set up tracking before creating content so you have baseline to compare against.
Don’t forget sales alignment.
The connection:
If prospects are using AI for consideration research:
What sales needs to know:
New sales questions you might hear:
Make sure sales is prepared for AI-influenced buyers.
Final thought on consideration phase:
The old funnel: Awareness -> Interest -> Consideration -> Decision
The AI-influenced funnel: Awareness -> AI Research (consideration compressed) -> Decision
AI is compressing the consideration phase. Buyers may go from “I need to solve X” to “AI recommended Y” very quickly.
Implication:
The consideration phase is where deals are won or lost, and it’s happening faster.
If you’re not in that AI research step, you’re not in the consideration set.
Invest heavily in consideration phase content. It’s the highest-leverage point in the AI-influenced buyer journey.
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor how your brand appears when prospects are actively comparing options. See your presence in comparison and evaluation queries.
Community discussion on optimizing for purchase decisions in AI. Real strategies from brands who improved their visibility in AI-generated product recommendatio...
Master AI consideration phase optimization with strategies for content structure, E-E-A-T signals, and topical authority. Learn how to become the authoritative ...
Community discussion on post-purchase AI search behavior. Marketers share experiences with customers using AI to validate purchases and seek alternatives.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.