What content formats actually get cited by AI? Testing different approaches
Community discussion on which content formats perform best in AI search. Real testing results and strategies for AI-optimized content.
I keep getting conflicting advice about header formatting for AI.
Some say: “All your H2s should be questions that match what people ask ChatGPT.”
Others say: “Just make headers clear and descriptive.”
Our current approach:
What I’m trying to understand:
Would love to see actual test results, not just theory.
I’ve tested this extensively. Here’s what the data shows.
The experiment:
200 articles across 3 months:
Results:
| Header Style | AI Citation Rate | Position When Cited |
|---|---|---|
| Question H2s | 38% | 2.4 avg |
| Statement H2s | 31% | 2.8 avg |
| Mixed approach | 35% | 2.6 avg |
The insight:
Question headers do perform better, but not dramatically. The 7% difference is meaningful but not game-changing.
What mattered more:
My recommendation:
Use question headers where natural, but don’t force it. Clarity and structure matter more than rigid format.
Exactly. Here’s my practical framework:
Use question headers when:
Use statement headers when:
Example article structure:
H1: Complete Guide to [Topic]
H2: What is [Topic]? (question - matches queries)
[Direct answer]
H2: Key Benefits (statement - overview section)
H3: Benefit 1
H3: Benefit 2
H2: How do you implement [Topic]? (question - matches queries)
[Step-by-step answer]
H2: Common Mistakes to Avoid (statement - list section)
[Bullet points]
H2: FAQ (question section with schema)
The mix is intentional and natural.
Adding research context to this discussion.
Why question headers help:
What research shows about AI extraction:
AI systems identify answer-worthy content by looking for patterns:
Question headers create these patterns naturally.
But clarity trumps format:
A clear statement header with a direct answer beats a confusing question header.
Good: “Common Implementation Challenges” Bad: “What About When Things Go Wrong With Your Implementation And You Need To Fix Them?”
The forced question is worse than the clear statement.
The rule:
Match natural language queries where possible. Prioritize clarity always.
Technical documentation perspective.
What works for technical content:
Question headers work for conceptual content:
Statement headers work for procedural content:
Our testing results:
| Content Type | Best Header Style |
|---|---|
| Conceptual | Question-based |
| Procedural | Statement-based |
| Reference | Statement-based |
| Troubleshooting | Question-based |
The pattern:
When users are asking “what/why/how” → question headers When users are following steps or looking up info → statement headers
AI citations by type:
The content type matters more than header format.
Agency perspective from hundreds of client articles.
What we’ve standardized:
Not a rigid format, but principles:
Principle 1: First H2 should be a question
Principle 2: Use mixed headers throughout
Principle 3: Match “People Also Ask”
Principle 4: Keep headers scannable
The template:
H2: What is [Topic]?
H2: Why [Topic] Matters
H2: How to [Action] with [Topic]
H2: [Topic] Best Practices
H2: Common [Topic] Mistakes
H2: [Topic] FAQ
This performs consistently well across clients.
Data analysis perspective.
What correlates with AI citation:
Analyzed 500 cited articles vs 500 non-cited articles.
Header characteristics of cited content:
Header characteristics of non-cited content:
The correlations:
| Factor | Correlation with Citation |
|---|---|
| Question format | 0.23 (moderate) |
| PAA matching | 0.41 (strong) |
| Descriptive length | 0.32 (moderate) |
| Logical hierarchy | 0.38 (strong) |
The insight:
Matching PAA queries and maintaining logical hierarchy are stronger signals than question format alone.
My recommendation:
Research PAA, match those patterns, ensure logical structure.
AI-specific perspective.
How AI systems use headers:
What helps AI extract effectively:
Format matters less than you think because:
AI models are trained on diverse content. They understand various header styles. What they need is clarity about:
The minimum viable header optimization:
Editorial perspective - balancing SEO and readability.
The tension:
SEO/AI optimization says: use question headers matching queries Readability says: use natural, varied headers that flow
How we balance:
Reader experience matters:
If every header is a question, the content feels like an FAQ, not an article. That affects engagement, time on page, and ultimately… what readers share and link to.
Our hybrid approach:
This serves both AI extraction and human reading.
The readability test:
Read your headers out loud. Do they sound natural? If they feel forced, they probably are.
Great practical advice from everyone. My conclusions:
The answer:
Question headers help (7% improvement) but clarity and structure matter more.
What I’m implementing:
What I’m NOT doing:
The template I’ll follow:
H2: What is [Topic]? (question)
H2: Key Benefits of [Topic] (statement)
H2: How do you [Action]? (question)
H2: [Topic] Best Practices (statement)
H2: FAQ (question section)
Next step:
Use Am I Cited to track which header formats correlate with better citations for our specific content.
Thanks everyone!
Get personalized help from our team. We'll respond within 24 hours.
Monitor which content structures get cited most. See how your header formatting impacts AI visibility.
Community discussion on which content formats perform best in AI search. Real testing results and strategies for AI-optimized content.
Community discussion on Q&A content structure effectiveness for AI citations. Real data and examples comparing content formats for AI search visibility.
Learn the best practices for formatting headers for AI systems. Discover how proper H1, H2, H3 hierarchy improves AI content retrieval, citations, and visibilit...
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience and analyze our traffic. See our privacy policy.