How to Compare Agent Accessibility with Competitors in AmICited

Agent readiness is relative — what matters is whether you’re ahead of the sites you compete with for citations. The competitor comparison in the Agent Accessibility audit lines your readiness up against your tracked competitors’, signal by signal.

Where to find it

It’s the Competitor comparison section near the top of Audit → Agent Accessibility, subtitled “How your llms.txt score compares with your tracked competitors’.” A Re-check competitors button refreshes it.

What it shows

A table with one row per domain (your own flagged you), comparing key readiness signals:

• llms.txt — presence and validity of each site’s /llms.txt.
• Accessibility — how agent-readable each site is.
• WebMCP — whether each exposes callable tools for agents.
• Commerce — agentic-commerce readiness.
• File — a direct link to each site’s llms.txt.

How to use it

1. Find where you trail. Any column where competitors are healthy and you aren’t is a priority fix.
2. Open their files. Use the File links to inspect a competitor’s llms.txt and learn from a good example.
3. Re-check competitors after you make changes, to confirm you’ve pulled ahead.
4. Prioritize by leverage. llms.txt and crawler access are usually the fastest wins with the biggest impact.

Use it alongside your own readiness summary: the summary tells you what’s broken, the comparison tells you how urgent it is relative to your rivals.