A €20 AI visibility package can cost more than a €50 subscription for the workload you need. A plan with 200 saved prompts can deliver fewer fresh observations than a plan with 50 prompts. Neither statement is a paradox: the products sell different units.
This guide compares the pricing architecture of SEO/GEO tools. It gives buyers a repeatable way to evaluate AmICited beside specialists, SEO suites and regional alternatives. Prices and packaging were checked on 18 October 2026; taxes, currencies, billing terms and future changes still need checking at checkout.
First define the monitoring basket
Consider 50 prompts, three engines and a daily refresh over 30 days. That is 4,500 engine-response observations, before separate countries, languages or repeated samples. The same set measured weekly, using four scheduled observations in the example month, requires 600 observations.
Double the market variants and the daily basket becomes 9,000. Repeat each question three times to assess answer variability and it becomes 27,000. This arithmetic does not establish that every vendor meters requests identically: it defines the work you want the quotation to cover.
50 prompts × 3 engines; a 30-day daily month or four weekly runs. Two markets and three repetitions are explicit multipliers.
Source: Worked examples, not vendor quotas
Keep consumer ChatGPT, an API response, Google AI Overview and Google AI Mode separate in the basket. They may differ in collection method, availability and commercial treatment. A vendor offering more model names is not necessarily delivering more observations on the surfaces your buyers use.
Model 1: shared credits, exemplified by AmICited
AmICited lists Starter €50, Pro €120 and Premium €500 per month, with 50, 120 and 500 credits respectively. The advertised response ceilings are up to 3,000, 8,000 and 33,000. One prompt on one engine for one observation is documented at 0.015 credits. Agents and article generation consume the same pool at different rates. AmICited pricing
For the 4,500-response daily basket, the arithmetic is 67.5 credits. That exceeds Starter’s 50 credits and fits inside Pro’s 120-credit pool before other work. The published limits and engine access still govern the purchase: the raw credit calculation does not override plan gates or the advertised response ceiling.
Starter does not include daily scheduling. Copilot access begins at Pro; Claude, Grok and DeepSeek appear at Premium. A buyer requiring a particular engine may therefore need a higher plan even when the response count is modest. Domain allowances of 1/5/50 and saved-prompt limits of 200/800/3,200 per domain are also distinct from monthly execution capacity.
Where AmICited fits: the shared pool is flexible when monitoring and action vary from month to month. It also creates a budgeting obligation: reserve enough capacity for scheduled observation before letting content or agents use the balance. Ask how a failed collection is charged and how remaining capacity is forecast.
Ready to Monitor Your AI Visibility?
Track how AI chatbots mention your brand across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other platforms.
Model 2: a subscription plus an AI measurement pack
Marketing Miner illustrates the importance of the base subscription. Its AI Visibility documentation describes a paid base plan from €19 and an AI pack from €20 for 1,300 credits. Measurement is stated at two credits per prompt/model and credits expire after 30 days. Treat the entry combination as approximately €39 before tax and any billing differences, not a standalone €20 GEO subscription. Marketing Miner AI Visibility
At that documented rate, a 1,300-credit pack represents 650 prompt/model observations. The example daily basket would consume 9,000 credits. Do not multiply the smallest pack’s price linearly and call the result an actual quote: larger packages, included capacity and commercial terms may change the total.
Collabim advertises 500 AI measurements for 383 CZK excluding VAT. Its page describes recurring scheduling and AI visibility analysis. Before comparing that number with 500 responses elsewhere, confirm how models multiply the measurement count, what base subscription is required and which engines are included. The page’s engine descriptions are not fully consistent across sections. Collabim AI Visibility
Where AmICited fits: compare the all-in basket against the subscription you would actually buy. A Czech agency already paying for Marketing Miner or Collabim has a different incremental-cost calculation from a new customer buying the entire stack.
Model 3: prompt tiers with bundled observations
Promptwatch publishes monthly packages at $95, $245 and $579, with 50/150/350 prompts, four models and 6,000/18,000/42,000 response allowances. Its agent, article and integration terms need reading alongside those headline numbers. The entry response allowance exceeds our 4,500-observation basket numerically, but market variants, scheduling and included models must match before calling it equivalent. Promptwatch pricing
Peec’s starter presentation includes 50 prompts, three selected models, daily tracking, one project and unlimited users. These are useful comparison dimensions even when a reliable numeric price cannot be extracted from the public pricing page during research. Obtain the actual currency and billing quote instead of recycling an old price from a review. Peec pricing
Otterly lists an entry point of $29, with engine add-ons affecting the configuration. A low starting price is meaningful for a small pilot; it does not price a larger multi-engine workload. Otterly pricing
Where AmICited fits: its €120 Pro tier and Promptwatch’s $95 tier should not be ranked by the smaller numeral. Compare currencies, usable engines, domains, users, response limits and action allowances on the same billing basis. A pilot should also test whether each vendor completes the scheduled observations reliably.
Stay Updated on AI Visibility Trends
Get the latest insights on AI mentions, brand monitoring, and optimization strategies.
Model 4: a search index, a toolkit or a standalone companion
Ahrefs Brand Radar distinguishes its existing index from custom prompt tracking. The public page showed custom tracking from €47 and index access from €179 in the researched configuration. Those entry prices buy different jobs. Index access helps discover questions and competitors outside a saved list; it should not be divided by your own prompt count as if it were a recurring custom panel. Ahrefs Brand Radar
Semrush’s AI pricing page displayed $99 per domain with a 25-prompt allowance in the shown annual-term configuration. Extra toolkits, users and domains can alter the total. Check the billing toggle and included products before comparing it with a monthly specialist subscription. Semrush AI pricing
SE Visible is a dedicated product from SE Ranking rather than another independent vendor. Its public package describes $99 monthly or $79 on annual billing, 200 prompts, five engines and approximately 30,000 responses across three projects. Confirm the current included engine list and schedule. SE Visible
HubSpot AEO is offered as a standalone product at $50 monthly or $45 on annual billing, and is included with Marketing Hub Professional and Enterprise. Its documented basket includes 25 prompts tracked daily across ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity. Existing HubSpot customers should compare their incremental cost and reporting integration rather than a fictitious second full subscription. HubSpot AEO
Where AmICited fits: a dedicated domain-investigation workflow may be attractive, but replacing a major SEO database is a different decision. Avoid charging the entire cost of an existing SEO suite against its GEO module while treating AmICited’s surrounding stack as free.
Model 5: local units, pooled execution and planned prices
XOVI’s Riva is presented as a standalone offer at €49 per domain per month, with additional domains at €29 and fortnightly monitoring. It does not require an XOVI suite subscription. A per-domain model may be easy to budget, but the refresh cadence and included business offerings still define what you receive. XOVI Riva
Local Falcon sells general credits used across local search workflows. Its entry price is $24.99, while the researched $49.99 package includes 15,150 general credits. A map-grid pin, local scan and AI-answer observation must not be treated as the same unit. Build a branch-level workload with locations, grid size, engines and cadence. Local Falcon pricing
Waikay lists a $24.95 entry package with 40 prompts, weekly tracking, four models and an eight-model API mode. Action-plan generation also uses allowance. This is another reason to compare the specific operating mode rather than counting logos on a homepage. Waikay
miruAI’s free tier and its planned paid prices belong in different columns. The page lists planned Solo and Pro prices of ¥9,800 and ¥29,800, while the free tier has a single engine/language and ten monthly questions. A planned package is not an available paid alternative. miruAI pricing
Where AmICited fits: for a retailer or multi-location business, the first question is whether the product measures the correct business entity. A cheaper global brand panel is poor value if the operational problem is an inaccurate recommendation for one branch.
A quotation brief that makes prices comparable
Send each shortlisted vendor the same workload. Specify the exact questions, markets, language variants, engine surfaces, sampling frequency and retention period. Ask for monthly and annual totals, tax treatment, currency, required base plans, onboarding charges and the price of adding the next client or country.
Then ask four operational questions: What counts as a billable observation? What happens on failure? What shares the allowance? What is exportable when we leave? Include raw answer history, source URLs, API access and user permissions in the response. Request a sample invoice or worked consumption example when the credit system remains unclear.
For AmICited, the practical buying test is the same as for every competitor: run the intended basket, inspect the evidence, follow a finding into an action and reconcile the resulting consumption with the quoted plan. Choose the package that supports that whole workflow at a predictable cost.
Continue with the market map, the Czech and Slovak perspective, or the country and language comparison.
LinkedIn